“marginally significant”

The interaction effects showed that all pairwise interactions between the factors were significant: the interaction between participant group and occlusion was significant F(2,118) = 3.910, p = 0.023,η 2 p = 0.062 ; the interaction between group and emotion was marginally significant F(2,118) = 2.923, p = 0.058,η 2 p = 0.047; and the interaction between occlusion and emotion was highly significant F(4,236) = 86.601, p < 0.001,η 2 p = 0.595.

Marginally significant differences existed between T2 sound earlier and T2 sound later conditions ( t (68) = −3.38, p = 0.001, Cohen’s D = −0.81, 95% CI = [−0.276, −0.071]).

1.7%; RR 1.62; 95% CI: 1.00–2.60; P=0.05; I 2 =7%; Figure 3D ) reached a marginally significant difference, the incidence of vocal cord palsy (2.9% vs. 0.77%; RR 3.64; 95% CI: 1.96–6.78; P<0.001; I 2 =0; Figure 4A ), and total complication rate (11.5% vs. 8.0%; RR 1.45; 95% CI: 1.20–1.74; P<0.001; I 2 =0; Figure 4B ) were significantly higher in 4LND+ patients.

The fully replicated soil temperature measurements performed in summer corroborated these results, showing a marginally significant effect of cover type on average summer soil temperature determined by the thermal cells ( F 3,39 = 2.20, p = 0.10; Table 1 ) and a highly significant cover effect on afternoon soil temperature (representing approximate daily maximum temperature; F 3,39 = 32.10, p < 0.001; Table 1 ).

The nomogram model was established using the N stage and the risk score since the risk score was highly significant ( p < 0.001) and the N stage was marginally significant ( p = 0.055) upon the multivariate Cox analysis.

On statistical analysis, there was only a marginally significant difference in the proportion of unresolved cases even after multiple CRP sessions between SC-BPPV and MC-BPPV (Z = 3.83, p < 0.001, equality of test for proportions).

A three-way ANOVA revealed marginally significant effects of pattern (F = 4.07, p = 0.052) and curing temperature (F = 3.48, p = 0.071), as well as a highly significant interaction between pattern and temperature (F = 12.28, p = 0.001), indicating that increasing the curing temperature from 75 °C to 90 °C substantially enhances the benefit of the hexagonal suction-cup geometry.

Intraclass correlation TD and TD siblings The intraclass correlation analyses showed a significant similarity in the left stria terminalis for RD (ICC = 0.772, P < 0.001) and a marginally significant correlation for FA (ICC = 0.704, P = 0.001) among typical siblings.

In multivariate regression analysis, marginally significant positive relationships were found between serum indium and urine indium levels ( P < 0.001), SP-A levels ( P = 0.037), IL-1β levels ( P = 0.043), IL-6 levels ( P = 0.008), PDW levels ( P = 0.029), TP levels ( P = 0.017).

The associated factors with the prevalence of allergic rhinitis were carpet (odds ratio [OR]: 1.79, p = 0.001), residential area (marginally significant), duration of residence (OR: 1.09, p < 0.001).

Adding DERS subconstructs, model 2 showed that the effect of EA became marginally significant and impulsivity ( b = .28, t = 3.60, p < .001) was significantly correlated with higher BPD scores.

Finally, the model on the VAS-11 yielded both a significant main effect of Time – with scores being overall lower at T1 ( M = 1.22, SE = 0.44) when compared to T0 ( M = 3.61, SE = 0.44) net of Group ; however, when exploratively assessing a marginally significant Time * Group interaction term (Fig. 2 ), post-hoc comparisons revealed that such a decrease in scores was actually significant ( p < .001) only for hyperhidrosis patients (T0: M = 4.67, SE = 0.65; T1: M = 1.44, SE = 0.65) and not for dystonia ones ( p = .110).

All the main effects and interactions were highly significant, p < 0.001, except for the age group x target congruency interaction, which was marginally significant, F (1, 45) = 3.46, MSE < 0.001, p = 0.069.

Similar results were observed for the RFS analysis; that is, there were significant and marginally significant RFS differences between the predicted high- and low-risk stage I patients in the meta-discovery (log-rank P<0.001; C-index =0.63; Figure S5C ) and integrated meta-validation (log-rank P=0.120, C-index =0.57; Figure S5D ) datasets, respectively.

Statistically, differences between +snow and control plots were marginally significant in June 2006 ( F 1,6 = 3.773, P = 0.100) and highly significant in April 2008 ( F 1,6 = 40.60, P < 0.001).

In a regression analysis, with classification accuracy as the outcome variable, model type and number of hidden states were highly significant regressors ( p < 0.001), and the number of networks was marginally significant ( p = 0.07) ( Supporting Information Table S1 ).

The GWASdb provides information of genetic variants except for that annotated in the NHGRI GWAS Catalog and manually curated the SNPs that are marginally significant ( P < 1.0 × 10 −3 ), collected from supplementary materials of each original publication.

Since our primary interest was in the Near Approach and the interaction effect between Condition and Distance was marginally significant, we examined the Near Approach revealing a significantly greater SCR response to the spider than the ball t (30) = 4.57, p < 0.001, d = 1.67.

For English musicians and non-musicians, the results revealed significant or marginally significant main effects of the following variables: vowel quality [χ 2 (1) = 43.46, p < 0.001], duration [χ 2 (1) = 6341.9, p < 0.001] and pitch direction [χ 2 (1) = 3.52, p = 0.06].

5, p = 0.010)], negative perception toward DD [schizophrenia (β = 0.43, p < 0.001), ASD (β = 0.38, p < 0.001), and ADHD (β = 0.40, p < 0.001)], the perception of the child psychiatrist of parents as being in opposition to the diagnosis [(schizophrenia: β = 0.48, p < 0.001; ASD: β = 0.23, p = 0.038, marginally significant after Bonferroni correction; ADHD: β = 0.35, p < 0.001)], and the presence of siblings with one of the three diagnoses in the patient's family [(schizophrenia: β = 0.46, p < 0.001; ASD: β = 0.28, p = 0.019, marginally significant; ADHD: β = 0.28, p = 0.009)].

When PIR was examined as a categorical variable, individuals in the highest PIR tertile exhibited a 0.1 lower TyG index compared to those in the lowest tertile in the crude model(β = -0.10, 95% CI:-0.13~-0.06, P < 0.001); Following adjustments in both Model 1 and 2, the association between PIR and TyG remained marginally significant (β =-0.17, 95% CI:-0.21~-0.13, P < 0.001 and β = -0.11, 95% CI:-0.15~-0.07, P < 0.001, respectively).

Furthermore, Egger’s test statistics confirmed the presence of marginally significant publication bias at a P-value < 0.001 ( Table 4 ). 3.5.

When examining costs, switch targets showed marginally significant restart costs [ t (21) = 1.99, p = 0.059, Cohen's d = 0.20], while repeat targets showed highly significant restart costs [ t (21) = 5.60, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.43].

Although variation in KP levels between non-pregnant and pre-clinical abortion groups was marginally significant (P=0.044), it was found to be highly significant between non-pregnant and clinically pregnant females (P<0.001).

Significance levels in this figure are denoted as follows: **** ( p < 0.0001) indicates highly significant, *** ( p < 0.001) indicates very significant, ** ( p < 0.01) indicates significant, * ( p < 0.05) indicates marginally significant, and ns indicates not significant.