Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Employment status and being worried about disappointing loved ones were marginally significant at p-values less than 0.10; after controlling for other factors, the odds of high versus low or medium PCAC score was 55% higher among women who reported working for pay than those who did not (p = 0.06) and 29% lower among women who were worried about disappointing loved ones compared to those who were not (p = 0.07), respectively.
As expected, the body position pattern showed low values (horizontal positions) at night and high values (vertical positions) during the daytime, with E-types showing a lower DM-NPM and an earlier phase marginally significant for NPM, compared to that of L-types ( Figure 2C and Table 2 ), and N-types again exhibited an intermediate behavior throughout the day ( Figure 2C ), which is also reflected in their circadian parameters ( Table 2 ).
Though this difference is not particularly substantial, given that the association was marginally significant for Hispanic Americans ( table 4 ), we propose that the difference may be attributed to the historical connection between the term “woke” and the Black community, thus making the term more racially coded as “Black” and thus foregrounding the in-group connection for Black Americans.
No significant differences in the relationships between AIP and its modified indices and incident stroke were observed across all subgroups, with the sole exception of a marginally significant interaction between cumulative AIP and sex (P for interaction = 0.048).
Study 1 provided little support for the association between TCs and HCC, but supervisor support did affect the association between techno-uncertainty (one of five TCs) and HCC, which was positive when support was low, but negative—albeit marginally significant—when support was high.
The combination of clustered ring enhancement and segmental distribution increased the PPV by approximately 4% to 66.67% (4 malignant lesions of a total number of 6, p = 0.049) and represented the highest PPV for malignancy among all possible combinations of internal enhancement and distribution patterns, with a marginally significant result.
Collaborators, who are moderately eHealth literate (slightly lower than patients in the autonomous-collaborator segment with P =.08, that is, marginally significant; see Multimedia Appendix 4 for details), talk significantly more to practitioners about problems with the online health information they have accessed than Autonomous-Collaborator patients ( P <.05; see Multimedia Appendix 5 for more details).