Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

After adjustment, unit increases in maternal Raven’s score and the HOME inventory score were independently associated with reductions in the risk of parent reported hyperactivity/oppositionality (Raven’s RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97, 1.00; HOME RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97, 1.00), albeit marginally significant ( Table 3 ).
Moreover, the [tCr] values measured at short TE were consistently elevated compared with controls across the three GWI syndrome variants and in both the right and left basal ganglia, with differences from controls being large and statistically significant in syndrome variants 1 and 3 bilaterally but paradoxically smaller and marginally significant in syndrome variant 2, the most clinically severe.
A one-way ANOVA revealed marginally significant trends suggesting that participants attributed different levels of intergroup bias (based on semantic differential ratings) to undocumented immigrants, F(3, 249) = 2.23, p = 0.09, d = 0.03, and Arabs, F(3, 249) = 2.63, p = 0.05, d = 0.03, as a function of condition ( Figure 2 A,B).
We found that the majority of tests involving the Siberian cave lion supported the null hypothesis (although only a few of these tests are marginally significant |Z| > 3.3, Fig. 2 C ), suggesting little or no gene flow between any extant modern lion lineage and Siberian cave lions.
The evolutionary history of extinct and living lions.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A · 2020 · PMC7245068
Relationship between genetic and epigenetic diversity within populations In restricted species, populations that had more genetic diversity tended to have also more epigenetic diversity, as revealed by the statistically significant (or marginally significant) correlation between most of the diversity indices measured for AFLP markers, on one side, and on the other for the group of methylated (M-MSAP) markers ( r = 0.374, 0.653 and 0.555; and P = 0.095, 0.0013 and 0.0089, for PPOL, SI and RI, respectively), or for the group of unmethylated (U-MSAP) markers ( r = 0.372 and 0.540; P = 0.096 and 0.0113, for SI and RI, respectively; Fig. 5 ).
A linear support vector machine (SVM) classifier trained to distinguish inhibition from NP in one modality successfully decoded inhibition states in the other modality (Auditory→Visual: 64.7% accuracy, p (FDR) < 0.001; Visual→Auditory: 55.8%, p = 0.043 [not survived after FDR but marginally significant]) [ Figure 3 A ; Table S10 and S11 , Supporting Information].