Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = .0470.9× alphagold
Posthoc one‐sample t ‐test showed significant or marginally significant results for the real iTBS condition (3T, t 18 = −2.13, p = .047; 3 T2D, t 18 = −2.07, p = .053; 5T, t 18 = −3.10, p = .006), but no significant effects for the sham iTBS condition (3T, t 18 = −0.53, p = .604; 3 T2D, t 18 = 0.69, p = .499; 5T, t 18 = 1.57, p = .133; Figure 3 , panel b).
marginally significantp = 0.0470.9× alphagold
A statistically significant linear increase across the repeated runs was found in the PCC ( R 2 = 0.234, p = 8.89 × 10 −7 ), left insula ( R 2 = 0.107, p = 1.39 × 10 −3 ), and right insula ( R 2 = 0.132, p = 3.47 × 10 −4 ) and marginally significant in the ACC ( R 2 = 0.043, p = 0.047).
marginally significantp < 0.0470.9× alphagold
In the visual retention domain, the Benton visual retention test match score analysis revealed a marginally significant negative association with IC3 tau uptake, with a bilateral temporal‐occipital pattern ( t = −2.01, p < 0.047), suggesting a potential link between tau accumulation in this IC map and visuospatial capabilities.
marginally significantp = .0470.9× alphagold
Three-way repeated measures ANOVA of Valence by Arousal by Hemisphere on P2b latencies ( Table 3 ) revealed a marginally significant main effect of Arousal ( F (1, 20) = 4.50, p = .047, η 2 p = .18), and a three-way interaction of Valence, Arousal, and Hemisphere ( F (1, 20) = 4.45, p = .048, η 2 p = .18), such that the latencies for high arousing negative pictures were shorter than those for low arousing negative pictures over the left hemisphere.
marginally significantP =0.0470.9× alphagold
The magnitude of pain reduction in the entire cohort treated with LMWF-5A was 42% from baseline and the treatment effect compared with vehicle control (estimated difference in WOMAC pain, −0.25; P =0.004) was also notable, especially relative to a previously reported study of hyaluronic acid, in which only a marginally significant treatment effect was observed (mean difference in WOMAC pain compared with control, −0.15; P =0.047).
marginally significantP = 0.0470.9× alphagold
The resistance differences were largely due to the relatively long knockdown times (i.e., higher resistances) of the Darwin, Alice Springs and Sydney populations (on average, 32% longer than those of the other populations). Regressing the median knockdown time against the five key weather variables yielded one significant association, a positive association with the minimum temperature of the coldest month, and this was marginally significant ( t 10 = 2.26, P = 0.047).
marginally significantp = .0470.9× alphagold
The individual effect of colony size emerged as marginally significant ( χ 2 = 3.95, p = .047), with slightly lower host δ 13 C values in juveniles (−16.3‰ ± 0.9‰) than in adults (−16.0‰ ± 0.9‰) (Figure 3b ); this was driven by lower host δ 13 C in juvenile Stylophora (−16.7‰ ± 0.7‰) than in adults (−16.0‰ ± 0.3‰) at Lizard Island before the heatwave.