Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantP = 0.0470.9× alphagold
The resistance differences were largely due to the relatively long knockdown times (i.e., higher resistances) of the Darwin, Alice Springs and Sydney populations (on average, 32% longer than those of the other populations). Regressing the median knockdown time against the five key weather variables yielded one significant association, a positive association with the minimum temperature of the coldest month, and this was marginally significant ( t 10 = 2.26, P = 0.047).
marginally significantp = 0.0470.9× alphagold
For the metric of modularity, the effect of scan length on the interaction between threshold and age group showed that there was a marginally significant interaction between age group and threshold for participants who completed the longer rest scan ( F 24 , 2248 = 1.534, p = 0.047), but there was a strong, significant interaction between age group and threshold for those who completed the shorter rest scan ( F 24 , 1088 = 2.734, p < 0.001).
marginally significantp = 0.0470.9× alphagold
Even though TC299423 had no significant overall effect on CPP in the WT mice (one-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD, p = 0.23), a t -test revealed a marginally significant increase in CPP difference score for the 0.012 mg/kg TC299423-injected group, compared to the saline-injected control ( p = 0.047) ( Figure 4A ).
marginally significantP = 0.0470.9× alphagold
7 ). Effect of ivermectin treatment on haemoparasite prevalence and community composition We did not detect a significant effect of ivermectin treatment on the prevalence of any haemoparasite species in translocated woylies, although there was a marginally significant interaction ( P = 0.047) between ivermectin treatment and TST for T. vegrandis (Table 1 ), with T. vegrandis prevalence being lower in treated compared to untreated hosts from September onwards (Additional file 5 : Figure S4).
marginally significantp = .0470.9× alphagold
The individual effect of colony size emerged as marginally significant ( χ 2 = 3.95, p = .047), with slightly lower host δ 13 C values in juveniles (−16.3‰ ± 0.9‰) than in adults (−16.0‰ ± 0.9‰) (Figure 3b ); this was driven by lower host δ 13 C in juvenile Stylophora (−16.7‰ ± 0.7‰) than in adults (−16.0‰ ± 0.3‰) at Lizard Island before the heatwave.