Weight loss from baseline was greater in the vaccine than placebo group, evident beginning at Ch+2 and marginally significant across the full study period (% weight loss p = 0.048; absolute loss p = 0.06) ( Figure 3A ).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
There was a small and marginally significant improvement in LVEF with combination β-blocker/digoxin compared with placebo/digoxin after 4 months of treatment (30.6 ± 9.6% vs. 26.0 ± 12.4%; P = 0.048). 56 Calcium channel blockers Non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (verapamil or diltiazem) are not recommended in patients with signific
However, only the difference in CIgen between MR alone and CT alone was marginally significant ( p = 0.048) [ 23 ].
The baseline characteristics of the patients in two groups in terms of age, BMI, nationality, tumor size, number and location were well balanced ( Table 1 ), but the difference in sex distribution was marginally significant ( p =0.048).
Similarly, moderately decreased serum LDL-C concentrations were also detected in the intervention group, although the difference was marginally significant (mean (SD): 75.33 (31.28) mg/dL vs . 94.60 (31.29) mg/dL; effect size: -0.62 (-1.22—-0.01); P value = 0.048).
Positive changes in α‐glucosidase and carnitine concentration were associated with the increased likelihood of a 10% sperm motility; however, their influence is marginally significant ( p = 0.048 for α‐glucosidase and p = 0.046 for carnitine).
The symptom “pain during nutrition” was marginally significant compared to PEG placement before the start of therapy ( p = 0.048).
The subtropical zone showed significantly higher evenness than the temperate zone ( p < 0.01), while the difference between the temperate and subalpine zones was marginally significant ( p = 0.048).
Despite a marginally significant Begg’s test ( p = 0.048), it is unlikely that this plot suggests the presence of publication bias given the small number of studies included in the analysis and the type of studies that are absent in the funnel plot (small studies reporting a positive association between OCPs and CVST).
Fitting the interaction between 7PS and dataset generated a marginal improvement in the model (Chisq = 10.905, p = 0.02352, df = 3), with the interaction 7PS* 35SNP_historical_cats being marginally significant (est = 0.228 ± 0.11, t = 2.00, p = 0.048).
In a sensitivity analysis, analysis of the change scores did find this effect to be marginally significant ( p = 0.048).
Taking the known SoFT mutation status in 537 patients into comparison, the marginally significant difference in survival time was present in patients with TARDBP mutations [ TARDBP (+): 2 vs. >2: 58.1 vs. 16.3 months, p = 0.048], while there was no significant difference in patients carrying SOD1 (log-rank p = 0.22), FUS (log-rank p = 0.55), or SoFT(–) (log-rank p = 0.08).
Based on post hoc test, the increase of CYP2C6 metabolic activity was marginally significant ( p = 0.048).
IM-1 (80%) was not significantly different from Med-PaLM 2 (80% vs 92%, difference=12 percentage points, P =.16), LLaVA-Med (80% vs 76%; P =.50), BioGPT (80% vs 68%; P =.22), or ChatGPT 5.0 (80% vs 64%; P =.048—marginally significant).
However, a marginally significant interaction [ F (2.902,493.418) = 2.408, p = 0.048] indicated that the peak in preference for intermediate D was slightly lower, and preference for low D higher, in synthetic edge images compared to the other two variations.
At the phylum level, in NBF there was a marginally significant (p = 0.048, Wilcoxon rank sum test) decrease in Bacteroidetes abundances from the dry to the wet season (Fig. 4d ), while Spirochaetes and Actinobacteria increased significantly (p = 0.010 and 0.021, respectively).
While there were marginally significant differences in N2 proportion in the whole sample (p=0.048), there were no significant group differences in N2 proportion in the analytic sample (i.e. after the exclusion of 4 studies due to noisy data) used for EEG analysis (p=0.14).
While there were no group differences in ACC with respect to mR of corporal objects (F(1, 44) = 1.91, p = 0.174), HC achieved higher accuracies than CD that were marginally significant (F(1, 44) = 4.134, p = 0.048).
Both mosquito presence and time significantly affected PC1 scores for leaf surface bacterial communities ( F = 45.5, df = 1, 22, P < 0.001; F = 8.44, df = 1, 22, P = 0.011), while scirtids had only a marginally significant effect ( F = 4.6, df = 1, 22, P = 0.048).
The pretest–posttest mean differences of the HBM constructs were not also statistically significant in the control group ( p > 0.05), except for the mean difference of the perceived benefits that showed a marginally significant difference upon completion of the study ( p = 0.048).
Similarly, rear-foot stride length did not differ between male mice of different ages and showed only a marginally significant difference between age groups in females (p = 0.048) (Figure 5C,D ).
When the coagulation sub-score was removed from the regression model, the liver sub-score became marginally significant as a predictor of hospital mortality (p = 0.048).
Meanwhile, our patients undergoing thoracic surgery had no significant difference in mild pain ( p = 0.083) and a marginally significant difference in moderate to severe pain ( p = 0.048) in comparison of patients undergoing surgery of skin and connective tissue ( Table 2 ), which might have resulted from the intraoperative intercostal nerve block prescribed in patients undergoing thoracic surgery.
Multivariate regression confirmed lower pNN50 in ASs after adjustment for RBD (p=0.029) and remained marginally significant after adjustment for RBD and gender (p=0.048 for NREM; p=0.088 overall).
Concerning FFM, just old rats in the ST25 group had a larger – tough marginally significant – percent increase from baseline compared with the old ST12 group (diet effect, same age, p = 0.048), and also tended to have a greater increase of FFM than adult ST25 rats (age effect, same diet, p = 0.061), see Figure 1E .