“marginally significant”

The difference in biosecurity spending was highly significant ( p = 0.0013), while the difference in infection reveals was marginally significant ( p = 0.0487).

Unknown genera in the hypersaline ( p value = 2.01E − 13) and polar ( p value = 2.41E − 9) habitats had significantly higher hub scores than Known genera, whereas in the deep sea environments the Unknown nodes were marginally significant ( p value = 1.77E − 3).

When we expanded t tests to include all 35 comparisons—and, like above, corrected for 35 comparisons—we found a significant difference in inference scores between students who exhibit mastery on question 5 and students who do not ( t = 3.41, p = 0.0012, d = 0.88), as well as a marginally significant difference in these students’ induction scores ( t = 3.26, p = 0.0018, d = 0.84; the Holm-Bonferroni cutoff is p = 0.00147).

Based on address and date of birth, there was marginally significant cross-clustering between cases of lymphoid leukemia (LL) aged 5-14 years and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) aged 0–14 years ( p = 0.0019).

In the RR-MS group, severity of fatigue, after controlling for depression symptoms, was associated with heightened role of the left amygdala within the entire brain network (indicated by a marginally significant positive association of betweenness centrality of this region with fatigue ratings: r =.561, p =.002).

For within-EXP group comparisons, the main effect of FREQUENCY was marginally significant for cooperation rate ( P = 2 × 10 −3 , corrected) and significant for cooperation streaks ( P = 1.4 × 10 −3 , corrected).

When using a background of highly expressed genes instead of all genes, we observed a marginally significant enrichment for this GO term in “trans_enh” (4.7 fold enrichment, p < 0.002).

No strong evidence of association was observed, although one SNP (rs743682) in FGFR3 (MAF=9%) was marginally significant after correction for multiple testing based on a V effLi of 23 (per-allele OR=1.05, 95%CI=1.02–1.09, P= 0.0020, α *=0.0022).

The difference between N400s elicited by English scientific metaphors and conventional metaphors was marginally significant at the left and middle parietal regions [P3: t (16) = −1.79, p = 0.091; Pz: t (16) = −1.90, p = 0.076], significant at the right frontal and central regions [F4: t (16) = −3.33, p = 0.004; C4: t (16) = −3.50, p = 0.003], and highly significant at the right parietal region [P4: t (16) = −3.65, p = 0.002].

Backward stepwise regression indicated three highly significant climatic Bioclim variables ( table 2 ), annual mean temperature ( p = 0.0020), annual precipitation ( p = 0.0047), and precipitation of wettest quarter ( p = 0.0063); and three marginally significant Bioclim variables, isothermality ( p = 0.0438), annual temperature range ( p = 0.0458), and mean annual diurnal range ( p = 0.0484). 4.

The NT-proBNP level was found to be marginally significant ( p = 0.002), but the effect size was small, suggesting that NT-proBNP might contribute to predicting hospital stay duration, though not as strongly as the other biomarkers.

Target before mask seemed to be reported more often with increasing SOA, especially with incongruent target–mask pairs, which is partially confirmed by a significant interaction of congruency × quadratic trend of SOA ( p = 0.018) and a marginally significant interaction of congruency × linear trend of SOA ( p = 0.002 for rater 1 and p = 0.078 for rater 2).

Only two correlations survived FDR correction for multiple comparisons, with a third being marginally significant: A negative correlation of Antisocial Attitudes with Stomach Activation (ρ = − 0.21, p = 0.002, p FDR = 0.03) and with Heart Activation (ρ = − 0.19, p = 0.003, p FDR = 0.03), and an almost-significant negative correlation of Impulsivity with Head Activation (ρ = − 0.17, p = 0.01, p FDR = 0.06; Fig. 2 c).

Gender was found to be a marginally significant predictor of device adoption, with male respondents adopting VR devices later than female respondents (β = 0.113, p = .002). 5 Age was also a factor, as older respondents reported adopting VR devices earlier (β = −0.096, p = .009).

The linear predictor for minutes spent in REM was marginally significant ( p = 0.067) whereas the quadratic predictor was highly significant (Fig. 4b ; p = 0.002).

P ST for PC2 was marginally significant but within the tail of the neutral distribution ( p = 0.002), while P ST for PC3 ( p = 0.02) and PC4 ( p = 0.7) were well within the neutral distributions (Fig. 9 ).

BD: A marginally significant difference in Channel 20 (OFC) with GradientSHAP (uncorrected p = 0.002; FDR-corrected p = 0.051), and significant with IG (FDR-corrected p < 0.05).

Partial spearman correlation analysis of steroid interrelationships and concentration network analysis 52 significant partial correlations were demonstrated within the control group (Table 8 ), whilst only one partial correlation between cortisol and corticosterone was marginally significant in the ME/CFS cohort ( r = 0.885, p = 0.002, q = 0.204) (Table 9 ).

Among all accessions, there was significant or marginally significant variation in average A under fluctuating PPFD ( p = 0.002, 1.50-fold variation among accessions, Figure 4A ), average g s under fluctuating PPFD ( p = 0.037, 1.78-fold variation among accessions, Figure 4B ), and average iWUE under fluctuating PPFD ( p = 0.069, 1.22-fold variation among accessions,

After stratification by region, the authors reported a marginally significant association between increased time-weighted arsenic exposure and elevated risk of breast cancer in Aarhus (Incidence Rate Ratio [IRR] = 1.06, 95%CI 1.01–1.11, p = 0.002) [ 45 ].

We detected a significant excess of variants in two of the pathways in CVID patients when compared to controls: Fc epsilon RI signaling and cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction pathways ( P < 0.001 and 0.002, respectively), plus two other marginally significant pathways after applying multiple test correction: cytosolic-DNA sensing, and NFKB signaling ( P = 0.002 and 0.001, respectively).

Additionally, the results showed a marginally significant repeated measures main effect, Wilk's Lambda = .813, F (1,49) = 11.234, p = .002, indicating a difference in depressive symptoms among all participants from time 1 to time 2, averaged over condition.

Using a fixed-effects model, the marginally significant reduction of the risk of post-ERCP abdominal pain associated with ulinastatin reached statistical significance (RR=0.71; 95% CI: 0.57–0.88; P=0.002; I 2 =67).

However, for all subgroup analyses, significant or marginally significant block main effects were found for N2 sink (all p = 0.002) and P3 source (all p ≤ 0.10), stemming from an overall reduction in amplitude over time. 4.

Due to marginally significant differences in IQ (as reported above), we controlled group comparisons for IQ, showing that ToM differences remained highly significant (e.g., for the total ToM score, F = 10.217; df = 1,57; p = . 002; η p 2 = . 152).