Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

In a supplementary analysis, the association between red meat and cold cuts and hPPZ FA remained significant after false discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple comparisons (p FDR = 0.012), whereas the other two associations were marginally significant (alcohol and FX FA, p FDR = 0.054; full-fat dairy and hPPZ FA, p FDR = 0.087). 3.4.
Results For the overall sample, the intervention for patients attained a significant mean reduction in HbA 1c levels of ‒0.27 (95% CI ‒0.45 to ‒0.10) at month 3 and ‒0.26 (95% CI ‒0.44 to ‒0.08) at month 6 compared with usual care, which remained marginally significant at month 12.
AMU, quantified as treatment incidence (TI), differed marginally significant between broiler farms in Belgium and the Netherlands (median BE: 8; NL: 3), whereas in weaned piglets (median BE: 45 and NL: 14) and finishing pigs (median BE: 5 and NL: 1), there was a substantial difference in AMU between farms from both countries.
The total protein content The average values (± S.E.) of the total protein content (mg/gm) at the indicated treatments recorded a marginally significant decrease of about 0.80–4.80% over the control, except for the corresponding value (61.14 ± 0.13 mg/gm) at both the highest conc. used (1.00%) and the continuous larval feeding pattern, where a marginal and statistically insignificant decrease (0.78%) over the control mean value (61.62 ± 0.06 mg/gm) was recorded.
The total number of offspring in both experimental periods was similar between the predator and control treatments; however, there was a marginally significant effect of more offspring being produced in the control than the predator treatment in the first three-day period (first three-day period: paired t-test, t 14 = 2.067, P = 0.058), with no effect in the second three-day period (paired t-test, t 14 = −0.648, P = 0.528) ( Table 1 ).