markedly significantqualified
Notably, both at the mRNA and protein levels, KIF2C and SFN exhibited markedly significant expression differences between HCC and normal tissues.
Notably, both at the mRNA and protein levels, KIF2C and SFN exhibited markedly significant expression differences between HCC and normal tissues.
Apart from the Middle Temporal Gyrus, Precentral Gyrus, and Precuneus, the Frontal Gyrus (encompassing the superior, middle, and inferior triangular parts) was markedly significant in AD detection 50 – 52 .
One-way ANOVA indicated a markedly significant difference in CXCR4 expression between the four glioma subtypes in the TCGA datasets.
We detected a markedly significant expansion of dermal Osterix+ cell populations within Gnas E1+/−;Osx-mCherry mice at 24 wk ( Figure 2C-E ) when compared to littermate Osx-mCherry controls within skin regions without radiographically detectable SCOs.
Applying the word innovation to a phenomenon requires that its occurrence cause markedly significant qualitative changes.
In the actual level that had a markedly significant difference, the optimal range was 8.0–10.5 μg/mL based on the average, standard deviation, and upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (# in Figure 7 ).
Comparing studies using a similar density per well (from 2 to 5 × 10 3 cells/well) it is possible to see that antiproliferative effects of morphine on BC cell lines seem to be associated with a reduced exposure time (up to 3 days) [ 26 , 39 ], while a stimulation of proliferative effect appears to be markedly significant only at exposures longer than 3 days [ 41 , 43 ].
In one randomized trial, a markedly significant decrease in suspected and confirmed cases of healthcare-associated pneumonia was seen in patients in the semirecumbent position (8% versus 34% incidence of clinically suspected, and 5% versus 23% of microbiologically confirmed cases).
Meanwhile, variance analysis indicated that the combination of the FCT penetration enhancement method and the CPE method had beneficial effects in enhancing skin penetration: the significance level of the CPE method was 0.0004, which was lower than 0.001, meaning the difference was markedly significant; the significance level of the FCT was also below 0.0001 and its difference markedly significant.
* p < 0.05 was considered significant, and ** p < 0.01 was considered markedly significant.
The most markedly significant domain was for declarative memory functioning.
A markedly significant difference between secukinumab and placebo was observed as early as 1 week after treatment initiation.
There was a markedly significant decrease in the IL-1ra/IL-1 ratio in the intestinal mucosa of both CD and UC.
However, due to the substantial overlap between the Pacocha and Pampa regions, differences in antibiotic presence between the two zones do not appear to be markedly significant.
The variation in speed changes across different frequencies is markedly significant.
In all statistical comparisons, values of P < 0.05 were considered significant, and values of P < 0.01 were considered markedly significant.
This suggests the inhibition of ~80% of total CPDs at any time point post UV exposure by MBPD, which is markedly significant.
However, the endogenous IAA contents of IT significantly greater than that of CK at 0, 1, and 3 DPA, along with markedly significant difference at 2 and 5 DPA, indicating that exogenous IAA promoted the secretion of endogenous IAA.
A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and values less than 0.01 were considered markedly significant.
When compared to the control group, the TTE in GSPE groups increased by 19.65, 51.51, and 93.37%, respectively, and the difference was markedly significant in the GSPE-M and GSPE-H groups.
P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and P < 0.01 was considered markedly significant (95% confidence interval).
This result was markedly significant as the expected GI bleeding event rate within two month after LVAD implant is near 39%[ 100 ].
The differences in echocardiographic parameters between those who experienced CV death and those who did not were most markedly significant for E/e′ and e′ Survival analysis Tables3 6 show the Cox regression analyses.
Speaking concisely our in silico screening and e-Pharmacophore models tempt us to speculate that P L and R L of LAQ824 have a markedly significant role in inhibiting HDAC1 and HDAC2 enzymes respectively.
However, the second protocol strategy with an elevated time of application (5 cycles at 5 min) had a markedly significant reduction compared to the first protocol (4 cycles at 2.5 min).