There was a moderately significant difference between the groups in terms of the Rejection Sensitivity Scale scores (p <0.05; effect size: 0.48).
← all phrases
“moderately significant”
Sighted at
P<0.11p>0.11
In the literature
For disinhibition, significant differences were seen between these levels, with a highly significant difference between low (22.57 ± 4.4) and medium (25.76 ± 6.07) (p < 0.001) and a moderately significant difference between low (22.57 ± 4.4) and high (29.43 ± 3.95) (p < 0.05).
For v-BVT, 1.19%, 2.5%, and 5.1% increases were observed for control versus mild NPDR (not significant), control versus moderate NPDR (moderately significant, P < 0.05), and control versus severe NPDR (moderately significant, P < 0.05) OCTA.
Pearson correlation between study variables is performed to find the degree of relationship, Pearson correlation coefficient ranging between −1 and 1, −1 being the perfect negative correlation, 0 is the no correlation, and 1 means perfect positive correlation Significant figures + - Suggestive significance ( P : 0.05 < P < 0.10) * - Moderately significant ( P : 0.01 < P ≤ 0.05) ** - Strongly significant ( P : P ≤ 0.01).[ 17 18 19 20 ] R ESULTS Of the 100 patients in our study, in our selected time frame, 51% were male and 49% were female.
Both barometric pressure and PM 1 concentrations also showed significant positive correlations ( P < 0.01), while the weekly mean minimum Rh showed moderately significant negative correlation ( P < 0.05).
Significance levels are indicated by asterisks: ns denotes non-significance, ∗∗∗∗ indicates highly significant ( p < 0.0001), ∗∗ indicates significant ( p < 0.01), and ∗ indicates moderately significant ( p < 0.05).
For the full dataset (N = 43), Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs were not significant, and Fu and Li’s D was negative, but only moderately significant (0.10 > p > 0.05), suggesting population expansion.
The concentrations of 100, 250, and 500 exhibited a significant value of less than ( p < 0.01), were found to be moderately significant ( p < 0.05), and caused delayed hatching at high concentrations of nanoparticles ranging from 750 to 1000 μg/mL.
There was a moderately significant decrease of 15.5% ( P < 0.05, Cohen's d = 2.33).
Significant figures +Suggestive significance ( P value: 0.05 < P < 0.10) *Moderately significant ( P value: 0.01 < P ≤ 0.05) **Strongly significant ( P value: P ≤ 0.01).
The mice in the high- and middle-dose curculigoside groups, as well as in the soy isoflavones group, show significantly enhanced standing times (P < .01), and the mice in Gengnian'an group show moderately significant enhancement in standing times (P < .05). 3.2 Effect on latency and number of electric shocks for mice modeling perimenopausal depression in passive avoidance The passive avoidance test results are shown in Table 2 .
The same trend was also observed for carbonate with Fe (r 2 = 0.88), Mn (r 2 = 0.88), Zn (r 2 = 0.72) and Cu (r 2 = 0.86), and a moderately negative correlation with As (r 2 = −0.55; p < 0.05) in the core of Chaube Chhapra but it showed a positive correlation with Zn (r 2 = 0.75) and a moderately significant with Mn (r 2 = 0.44; p < 0.05) only.
Comparison of the mean expression levels between T1D and MA groups revealed highly significant differences for six proteins (sTNFR1, sTNFR2, sIL2Rα, MMP2, sIL6R, and sgp130; P < 1 × 10 −5 ) and moderately significant differences for four proteins (CRP, SAA, sICAM1, and sVCAM1; P < 0.05) (Table S1 in Supplementary Material).
The Tree1*Grass2 variable was moderately significant ( p = 0.050), indicating that the sidewalk with trees on one side and grass on both sides had a 0.613 °C lower air temperature gap between children and adults, compared to the sidewalk with no tree and no grass.
1 b and 3 ) (moderately significant at p value = 0.05).
The significance of results was considered: P < 0.001, highly significant; P < 0.01, moderately significant; and P < 0.05, significant; P > 0.05, not significant.
P ≤ 0.001 considered as highly significant, P ≤ 0.01 considered as moderately significant, P ≤ 0.05 considered as significant with respect to disease control group.
A previous study in Medan reported different findings, namely that there was a moderately significant negative correlation between BI and serum 25(OH)D levels in newly diagnosed leprosy patients (r=-0.510; p<0.05).
Statistical significance was defined as follows: * moderately significant ( P value: 0.01 < P ≤ 0.05); ** strongly significant ( P value: P ≤ 0.01).
For Experiments 2 (T24) and 3 (T23) the highly significant results gave evidence of a common phasing among animals (p < 0.002; Scheme 3, S3 ), while the Tidal T-cycle Experiments 5 (T t = 12.25) and 6 (T t = 12.65) each gave moderately significant evidence of common phasing (p = 0.05 and p = 0.01; Scheme 3, S3 ).
P value: 0.05 < P < 0.10 indicated suggestive significance, *moderately significant ( P = 0.01 < P ≤ 0.05) and **strongly significant ( P ≤ 0.01).
Analysis: Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis – Student's t - and Chi-square/Fisher exact test were used (SAS 9.2, SPSS 15.0) P value described as *moderately significant ( P value: 0.01 < P ≤ 0.05) **strongly significant ( P value: P ≤ 0.01).
Likewise, the two-way ANOVA of alpha diversity measured by the Chao1 Index found TSI as a significant factor ( p < 0.01), and its interaction with RD was a moderately significant factor (0.1 < p < 0.05), while the exclusive impact of RD emerged as insignificant in explaining the bacterial alpha diversity profile.
The Team Structure and Function sub-component scale had a moderately significant positive correlation with the validated Team Climate Inventory, r = 0.45, p < 0.05.
p < 0.001 was considered to be highly significant (***), p < 0.01 was considered moderately significant (**) and p < 0.05 was considered a low level of significance (*).