Barely Significant
← all phrases

nearly significant

3,350 sentences · 3,350 papers · 3,797 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.0579p=0.06

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nearly significantp = 0.0521.0× alphagold
Among T-implanted females, there was no detectable correlation between plasma T levels and the number of days elapsed since implantation (Pearson’s r = −0.27, n = 10, p = 0.44), and there was a nearly significant positive correlation between female aggression score and the number of days elapsed since implantation (Pearson’s r = 0.55, n = 13, p = 0.052), suggesting that, if anything, the behavioral effect of the T implant increased over time, rather than decreased.
nearly significantP value = 0.0521.0× alphagold
The nearly significant enrichment ( P value = 0.052), of genes exhibiting paternal preferential expression in the human early embryo that correspond to pig orthologs mapping near a MN peak with predicted ZNF263 binding motif in sperm ( Table S7 ) suggest that these MN peaks may be epigenetic marks in sperm that trigger the expression of specific genes upon fertilization.
nearly significantP = 0.0521.0× alphagold
Myostatin levels were significantly decreased ( P = 0.010), and irisin levels showed a nearly significant reduction ( P = 0.052) in the dapagliflozin group compared with the control group, whereas FGF21 levels did not change significantly from baseline to the end of the intervention in both the dapagliflozin ( P = 0.673) and the control ( P = 0.823) groups.
nearly significantp = 0.0521.0× alphagold
On the other hand, NK-cell mediated viral suppression was 34 ± 7% in the presence of PRO (increased in 8/10 donors) and 37 ± 4% with ROM/PRO combination (increased in 7/10 donors), this latter being higher than in ROM-treated and untreated co-cultures in a statistically significant and nearly significant ( p = 0.052) manner, respectively ( Figure 5 B).
nearly significantp = 0.0521.0× alphagold
The ANCOVA revealed no significant subgroup effect (F(1,29) = 2.02, p = 0.17), demonstrating that prosthesis-similarity does not significantly differ because of cause/developmental period of hand loss, and a nearly significant usage effect (F(1,29) = 4.11, p = 0.052), indicating that the relationship between prosthesis categorisation and usage is relatively independent from potential subgroup effects.
nearly significantP = 0.05211.0× alphagold
Epidermal cell density was also affected by elevation (abaxial side significant, adaxial side nearly significant with P = 0.0521), with lowland maize producing higher densities (i.e., smaller cell size) than midland and highland maize [Adaxial epidermal cell density: lowland maize, 1253.6 cells/cm 2 (35.69); midland maize, 1219.3 cells/cm 2 (38.84); highland maize, 1116.3 cells/cm 2 (35.22); Abaxial epidermal cell density: lowland maize, 1214.1 cells/cm 2 (33.76); midland maize, 1081.1 cells/cm 2 (34.04); highland maize, 1059.7 cells/cm 2 (33.47)].