Barely Significant
← all phrases

nearly significant

3,280 sentences · 3,280 papers · 3,797 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.0579p=0.06

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nearly significantP = 0.06261.3× alphagold
We observed that preconditioning significantly diminished upregulation of Hmox (FC = 0.37, P = 0.0242), reduced the expression of Fas receptor mRNA, Fas (FC = 0.36, P = 0.0223), produced a nearly significant reduction in Fas ligand mRNA upregulation, Fasl (FC = 0.40, P = 0.0626), but did not affect Mlkl (FC = 1.01, P = 0.999) mRNA expression ( Figs. 4 P–S).
nearly significantp = .0631.3× alphagold
As in the main experiment, the ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of Congruence [F(1,20) = 20.09, MSE = 1792.32, p < .0003, η p 2 = .50], reflecting a higher percentage of antisaccades in the incongruent trials (10.56 ± 1.64%) compared to the congruent trials (6.03 ± 1.26%), and a nearly significant effect of SOA [F(1,20) = 20.09, MSE = 513.23, p = .063, η p 2 = .16], reflecting a higher percentage of antisaccades when the distracting gaze preceded (9.51 ± 1.81%) the instruction cue onset, rather than followed it (7.08 ± 1.13%).
nearly significantP = 0.0631.3× alphagold
Although fetuin-A was found to be positively associated with IMT (β = 0.156, P = 0.019), the association between T50 and IMT was not significant in any model. Subgroup Analyses Stratified by the Kidney Function In all of the above models, the interaction term between T50 and reduced eGFR was nearly significant (P = 0.063, 0.058, 0.058, and 0.064 for models 1 through 4, respectively), suggesting a potential effect modification by the eGFR.
nearly significantP = 0.06391.3× alphagold
After adjusting for confounding factors, the overall effect in the NIHSS score model remained significant (adjusted OR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.40, P = 0.0361), and the overall effect in the GCS model was nearly significant (adjusted OR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.29, P = 0.0639), with the direction of the effect consistently suggesting an increased risk (Table 3 ).