Barely Significant
← all phrases

nearly significant

3,288 sentences · 3,288 papers · 3,797 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.0579p=0.06

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

On the other hand, ∆HR appeared moderate to largely correlated with HR baseline (r = -0.62), lnSDNN (r = 0.50), lnRMSSD (r = 0.67), lnHF (r = 0.65), lnLFHF (r = -0.51) and α 1 (r = -0.56) in the Pearson correlation; but only the association with HR baseline (r = -0.58) and lnHF (r = 0.51) remained significant in the partial correlation, although the correlation with lnLFHF (p = 0.53; r = -0.48) was also nearly significant ( Table 4 ).
The relationship between intervention 2 compared to 0 was nearly significant in both the crude and adjusted analysis (OR = 2.30, 95% CI [0.97-5.48], Adjusted OR = 2.37, 95% CI [0.99-5.67] respectively), hence among women who had their 1 st ANC visit in the 2 nd trimester of their pregnancy, women who were in the APAS and resided in the MVP cluster had twice the odds of going for more, rather than less, ANC visits compared to women who were not in the APAS and resided outside the MVP cluster (power = 0.58).
Comparisons by language in separate analyses showed that, in year 2 [ F (2,93) = 14.971, p < 0.001, p η 2 = 0.25], the pupils writing in Spanish made significantly fewer root level errors than pupils writing in English ( p < 0.001), or Catalan ( p < 0.001); in year 4, the difference remained significant [ F (2,92) = 4.533, p = 0.013, p η 2 = 0.09] between the Spanish and the Catalan children ( p = 0.018) but was only nearly significant between the Spanish and the English children ( p = 0.0.66); finally in year 6, only the Spanish and the English children showed significant differences [ F (2,98) = 6.181, p = 0.003, p η 2 = 0.12] ( p = 0.002 for the post-hoc contrast).