Barely Significant
← all phrases

not quite significant

654 sentences · 654 papers · 6,904 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=.11p=0.118

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

not quite significantp = .1112.2× alphagold
Changes in ACT use in Rukwa were modest and insignificant, while the change in Mtwara between Rounds 1 and 3 was substantial at 10.55 percentage points among individuals and 13.08 among households, though not quite significant at conventional levels (p = .111 for individuals, p = .083 for households).
not quite significantP = .122.4× alphagold
CD4 cells did not show any significant alterations in the meta-analysis, although CD4 Mem cells, characterized by the high expression of IL7R, PLP2, and Fos seemed to have an overall decrease in NDMM compared with the precursor stages, which was seen in both data sets ( P ≤ .05 in the UAMS and UoH data set), although not quite significant in the meta-analysis ( P = .12) ( Figure 2 A).
not quite significantP = 0.132.6× alphagold
Single features associated with prognosis were (in order of decreasing significance according to single variate analysis): FIGO stage (P = 0.0002), bulky disease (P = 0.004), standard deviation and mean of nuclear area (P = 0.0006 and P = 0.01), cellular DNA content (P = 0.01), mitotic activity index (P = 0.08) and volume percentage epithelium (P = 0.13, not quite significant).
not quite significantp = 0.132.6× alphagold
Spiteful types are also more common among individuals than among teams, although this time the difference is not quite significant (13% vs. 4%, p = 0.13), probably due to the low number of observations. 4 Decision-making process within teams Having documented substantial differences in the final choices of individuals and teams, we now turn to the specifics of the process of team decision making which can give us insights into the sources of these differences.
Revealed distributional preferences: Individuals vs. teams.
J Econ Behav Organ · 2014 · PMC4375946
not quite significantp = 0.52610.5× alphagold
The 2nd versus 1st quartiles of the di- ortho congeners [OR = 0.27 (95% CI: 0.10, 0.74)] was significant but inverse while the difference between the 4th versus 1st quartiles of the tri- and tetra- ortho congeners [OR = 2.90 (95% CI: 0.99, 8.51)] was positive and not quite significant ( p = 0.526).
not quite significantP = 0.59411.9× alphagold
Interaction between MC4R rs17782313 and energy and fat intake to determine the risk of obesity There was relevant, but not quite significant ( P = 0.594), interaction between energy intake and MC4R polymorphism in determining the risk of obesity after adjusting for confounders such as age, gender, area, total activity and smoking status ( P = 0.0594; Table 4 ).
Importantly, the results of the current study indicate significantly (and clearly) different effects on the SCP for the three different hearing aids, with the DigitalB hearing aid condition showing significantly smaller amplitudes than the other hearing aid conditions, both digital hearing aid conditions showing longer (albeit not quite significant) latencies, and the Analog hearing aid showing larger SCP amplitudes than the digital hearing aid conditions.