Barely Significant
← all phrases

only marginally significant

5,077 sentences · 5,077 papers · 5,448 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<1.0p=0.9

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Relationship between centrality and fitness for different species' functional groups Although autogamous species produced an overall higher standardized number of seeds per flower (mean ± SE: 0.37 ± 0.01) than entomophilous‐actinomorphic and ‐zygomorphic species (0.05 ± 0.003 and 0.11 ± 0.01, respectively), the differences were only marginally significant (Table 1b ).
The relationship with the Anxiety scale was statistically significant in the zero-order and partial correlations, and in the t -test, but only marginally significant in the ANCOVAs (although caution should be applied when discussing marginal significance; see Pritschet et al., 2016 ).
Mean (±se; t-test) net displacements were 5 m eastwards (± 23 m; t = 0.22, df = 5, P = 0.84) and 6 m southwards (± 13 m; t = -0.50, df = 5, P = 0.64) for the flight-experienced beetles, and 76 m westwards (± 50 m; t = -1.51, df = 3, P = 0.23) and 114 m southwards (± 34 m; t = -3.33, df = 3, P = 0.045) for the flight-naïve beetles ( Fig 4 ), indicating that southward directionality, or drift, was only marginally significant for the flight-naïve beetles.
Regarding non-resource stress factors, we found a more pronounced positive relationship between functional diversity and tree C accumulation in highly acidic soils (though only marginally significant), while N accumulation in the mineral horizon increased with tree functional diversity in environments with high heatwave stress, partly validating the stress-gradient hypothesis 12 .
DISCUSSION The results from our epidemiologic analysis suggest that the rare allele of XRCC1 R194W increases breast cancer risk, while the rare alleles of XRCC1 R280H and XRCC1 R399Q decrease risk among women from high-risk families, though these findings were only marginally significant with XRCC1 399Q.
However, the path from intrinsic motivation to innovation behavior ( β = 0.18, t = 2.0, p < 0.05) and those from cognitive load to innovation outcomes (CL2 → IS2: β = −0.18, t = −2.1, p < 0.05; CL3 → IS3: β = −0.16, t = −1.9, p < 0.05) were only marginally significant, suggesting that the influence of motivation weakens as it moves from psychological and cognitive processes to observable innovative action.