Interestingly, the bivariate correlation between the pragmatic language problems subscale score and ΔP3 was only marginally significant.
← all phrases
“only marginally significant”
Sighted at
p<1.0p=0.9
In the literature
Though the differences between physical activities were only marginally significant, FA-BHQ values for the hand massage with lavender oil group and office stretching group did increase while FA-BHQ values for three of the other four groups, including the control group, decreased.
Overall, the higher incidence of campylobacteriosis described in the rural area was also evident in each of the age bands analyzed, although the difference in 0- to 14-year-old patients was only marginally significant (IR 1.72, 95% CI 0.91–3.18).
However, this interaction was only marginally significant, indicating a fading out of the anger effect after the task had ended.
Although only marginally significant at 10%, in a model that only controls for psychosocial variables, increasing vulnerability risk is associated with earlier entry into motherhood.
However, it should be noted that the difference in brain-behavior correlation between groups was only marginally significant, and thus inferences regarding this effect of OT need to be drawn with caution.
Although the direct effect of knowledge on practice was only marginally significant, the significant indirect effect supported hypothesis 1 in the context of partial mediation.
In contrast, in the short-day gene list, “ether lipid metabolism” was the only marginally significant term (FDR = 0.058; Figure S1 ).
We found only marginally significant differences between GG and GT genotypes regarding family history of depression.
The numbers of RFL generally showed a negative association with suicidal reattempts and suicidal ideations, but this was only marginally significant for RFL at time point 3 and only for suicidal ideation.
Third, it is important to acknowledge that the nonlinear effect on anxiety was only marginally significant.
Relationship between centrality and fitness for different species' functional groups Although autogamous species produced an overall higher standardized number of seeds per flower (mean ± SE: 0.37 ± 0.01) than entomophilous‐actinomorphic and ‐zygomorphic species (0.05 ± 0.003 and 0.11 ± 0.01, respectively), the differences were only marginally significant (Table 1b ).
The relationship with the Anxiety scale was statistically significant in the zero-order and partial correlations, and in the t -test, but only marginally significant in the ANCOVAs (although caution should be applied when discussing marginal significance; see Pritschet et al., 2016 ).
In contrast, in the second component, a significance level of approximately 10% was noted, which suggests that the differences among the groups were less pronounced or only marginally significant in this context.
Mean (±se; t-test) net displacements were 5 m eastwards (± 23 m; t = 0.22, df = 5, P = 0.84) and 6 m southwards (± 13 m; t = -0.50, df = 5, P = 0.64) for the flight-experienced beetles, and 76 m westwards (± 50 m; t = -1.51, df = 3, P = 0.23) and 114 m southwards (± 34 m; t = -3.33, df = 3, P = 0.045) for the flight-naïve beetles ( Fig 4 ), indicating that southward directionality, or drift, was only marginally significant for the flight-naïve beetles.
Though the effect was small and only marginally significant ( Supplementary Table 11 ), this finding contradicted the prediction of psycholinguistic masculinisation in lesbian authors ( Supplementary Table 1 ).
On the analyzing scale, the only marginally significant difference was found between the controls and the siblings.
Regarding non-resource stress factors, we found a more pronounced positive relationship between functional diversity and tree C accumulation in highly acidic soils (though only marginally significant), while N accumulation in the mineral horizon increased with tree functional diversity in environments with high heatwave stress, partly validating the stress-gradient hypothesis 12 .
DISCUSSION The results from our epidemiologic analysis suggest that the rare allele of XRCC1 R194W increases breast cancer risk, while the rare alleles of XRCC1 R280H and XRCC1 R399Q decrease risk among women from high-risk families, though these findings were only marginally significant with XRCC1 399Q.
In our study, although only marginally significant, connectance value decreases with increase in network diversity across zones.
Moreover, these differences were only marginally significant, and therefore the results must be interpreted cautiously.
A highly significant genotype effect was found for SRN among the 16 NIAB Diverse MAGIC founders grown at Duxford but was only marginally significant among the 20 WHEALBI accessions grown at Sonning.
However, the path from intrinsic motivation to innovation behavior ( β = 0.18, t = 2.0, p < 0.05) and those from cognitive load to innovation outcomes (CL2 → IS2: β = −0.18, t = −2.1, p < 0.05; CL3 → IS3: β = −0.16, t = −1.9, p < 0.05) were only marginally significant, suggesting that the influence of motivation weakens as it moves from psychological and cognitive processes to observable innovative action.
Informal creative training was not included in the post Design Product Ideation model as the simple correlation was only marginally significant.
Besides, in both the model with childhood trauma and psychological control there were significant main effects of sex on the intercept and on the slopes of perspective taking between age 13 and 16 (although only marginally significant for childhood trauma) and between age 16 and 20.