“only marginally significant”

Whilst the semantic class of the image was related to classification accuracy, the raw meaning (as measured by the average semantic differential scores) was only marginally significant (all p >0.05).

CD44v6 positivity also correlated with poor prognosis, although the trend was only marginally significant (OS: p = 0.050; EFS: P = 0.058, Figure 1 C and D).

Although there were no statistically significant 2-way interactions ( p's > 0.26), follow-up pair-wise t-tests showed that post-training theta power in the eMBT group was decreased in the 3-back condition only compared to baseline ( t (15) = 3.89, p = 0.001), but only marginally significant compared to post-training theta power in the Control group ( t (27) = 2.06, p = 0.05).

Surprisingly, although 22G-RNAs silence TEs, we found that the total levels of 22G-RNAs mapping to TEs were increased in lines maintained at smaller population sizes, although this increase was only marginally significant (Jh, p = 0.05; LR, p = 0.07; Fig. 5 d). 22G-RNA levels mapping to TEs targeted by piRNAs behaved similarly (Additional File 1 : Fig.

Figure 2 C illustrates that this was indeed the case: for IDDs the correlation between DST scores in the two languages was highly significant (Pearson: r = .60, p < .001, Spearman r = .61, p < .001), whereas for controls it was not (Pearson: r = .25, p = .179, Spearman r = .27, p = .151; though the group difference between the strength of the correlations was only marginally significant: Fishers Z-test, z = 1.64, one-sided p < .05; Fig. 2 C; Lenhard & Lenhard, 2014 ).

This finding should be interpreted with caution since it was only marginally significant ( p = 0.05) in one out of several tests conducted.

However, this was only marginally significant (P<0.05) ( Table 4 ).

After adjusting for covariants, the AG genotype for rs40593 (OR=0.557, 95% CI=0.331-0.938; p =0.028), the CT genotype for rs3755751 (OR=0.579, 95% CI=0.347-0.966; p =0.036), and the G-allele carriers (AG plus GG) for rs40593 (OR=0.535, 95% CI=0.324-0.886; p =0.015) still exhibited a significant protective effect; however, the association between T-allele genotypes and rs3755751 was only marginally significant (OR=1.637, 95% CI=0.999-2.681; p =0.05).

However, when each climatic variable was individually reduced from the full model, Tmin, Tmax were not significant and rainfall was only marginally significant (AIC = 428, P = 0.05) (Table 1 ).

However, the effect of the refractive state was only marginally significant for older ages >40 years ( P ≥ .05) except for the age group “aged 40 to 49” (scotopic; P < .05). 3.3.

A positive correlation between CV CL and CV CI is only marginally significant (p < 0.05), while all other correlations are not significant (p > 0.05). Discussion The significant negative correlation between THL and M CA points towards selective observer bias that tends to overestimate the length of the short arm.

While the main effect of synchrony was only marginally significant (F 1,352 = 3.9, p = 0.05), there was an interaction between synchrony and age group (F 1,352 = 7.7, p = 0.006).

Such a difference was also observed in men with MetS relative to those without MetS, though results were only marginally significant ( P = 0·050).

We did not observe a significant genetic correlation between male BSB and childlessness but observed a significant positive genetic association between female BSB and childlessness that would become only marginally significant (adjusted P = 0.05) upon the control of multiple testing (table S3).

Differences in salinity among sites were only marginally significant (Kruskal-Wallis, p = 0.05); however, salinity at all sites was significantly different among sampling dates (Kruskal-Wallis, p<0.01) as the July sampling had a significantly higher average salinity (29.2 ppt) than the August sampling (19.7 ppt; Dunn’s test with Bonferroni correction, p<0.01).

reticulata , however, this difference is only marginally significant (median d S XY = 0.0045 in P. reticulata ; median d S XY = 0.0057 in P. wingei ; P = 0.05, Wilcoxon signed rank test).

That is, although differences between the two sites were only marginally significant, L. variegata seemed more strongly limited by PO 4 3− (Two Proportion Z-test; Z = 1.90; df = 70; P = 0.05) and less strongly limited by NO 3 − (Two Proportion Z-test: Z = −1.79; df = 70; P = 0.07) at Buoy 0 than at Playa Kalki ( Fig. 6 ).

Although the association was only marginally significant ( p = 0.05), the findings indicate that students taught exclusively through an online platform scored, on average, 0.26 GPA points lower than those taught using a blended approach (β = −0.26, 95% CI: −0.52 - −0.20, p = 0.05).

Discussion The effect of exercise on SAPWV in postmenopausal women remains uncertain, as the overall pooled effect was only marginally significant (g = −1.07, 95% CI = −2.15, 0.00; p = 0.05), with the confidence interval including zero-indicating that the true effect could be null or even negative.

The sample of Caracas, Venezuela, presented a shifted allele frequency distribution but the corresponding heterozygosity test was only marginally significant ( p < 0.05).

When compared with baseline, the increase in telomerase activity in the intervention group after 22 weeks was only marginally significant ( d , 0.13; 95% CI, 0.001-0.27; P = .05), whereas the mean change in the wait-list control group was not statistically significant ( d , −0.03; 95% CI, −0.16 to 0.10; P = .64).

In general, the clinical sample had larger means than the controls for depression (t = −4.05, p = 0.00, d = 0.91), anxiety (t = −6.34, p = 0.00, d = 1.45), NATs (t = −2.64, p = 0.01, d = 0.61), IBs (t = −2.91, p = 0.00, d = 0.67), fatigue (t = −2.44, p = 0.02, d = 0.55), and health status (t = −6.38, p = 0.00, d = 1.42), with the exception of DAs, which was only marginally significant (t = −1.96, p = 0.05, d = 0.45).

The DASS-A emerged as the only marginally significant predictor of ratings for the ambiguous danger CS D, ρ(49) = −0.27, p = 0.05.

However, this difference was only marginally significant (Mann–Whitney U -test: Z = −1.94, N = 7, P = 0.05, Fig. 6 ).

Temperature decrease also induced less reduction in glucose, fructose and sucrose in the roots and leaves (before decay, p < 0.05), but only marginally significant in the stems (p < 0.05).