“only marginally significant”

The only marginally significant temporal trend observed was a decrease ( p = 0.008) in POM-C concentrations that occurred between spring and fall during the maize phase of the 3YR rotation, where POM-C fell from a spring high of 2.79 g cm -3 to a fall value of 1.48 g cm -3 ( Fig 1A ).

Using the top-ranked genes, we largely recapitulated the ER+ and basal-like subtypes (Additional file 6 : Figure S2c) although the association between patients’ survival and our subtypes is only marginally significant after multiple testing adjustment ( P = 0.008, Additional file 7 : Figure S3c).

t -tests demonstrated that these correlations were significant in all scene-selective ROIs except for the LH RSC, where the correlation was only marginally significant (LH PPA: r ̄ = .17, t (14) = 3.05, p < .009; RH PPA: r ̄ = .15, t (14) = 3.06, p < .008; LH RSC: r ̄ = .08, t (14) = 1.88, p < .08; RH RSC: r ̄ = .15, t (14) = 4.29, p < .001; LH OPA: r ̄ = .23, t (14) = 7.38, p < .000003; RH OPA: r ̄ = .16, t (14) = 2.24, p < .04).

5 , neither scenario substantively changes our conclusions, with the only changes in significance being for percent Latino/a and percent without a high school diploma—both of which were only marginally significant in our primary models ( p > 0.01).

Floral density decreased with increasing drought severity in both datasets, although this relationship was only marginally significant at the seven sites (RMBL: Figure 2a ; β = −0.06, SE = 0.01, t = −4.22, p < 0.01; seven sites: Figure S3a ; β = −0.18, SE = 0.08, t = −2.24, p = 0.06).

lnCatalase was associated with worse Reasoning (b = -.081, p < .001), but the associated p value from the multivariate test was only marginally significant at .051. lnUreA was associated with worse Reasoning (b = -.059, p < .01); the p value from the associated multivariate test was .049.

This treatment was also repeated twice over a 12-month period ( Figure 1B3 , estimate = –0.52, p=0.01, GLMM as above, see Table 1 for the results of each repetition, note that the second repeat was only marginally significant).

In the partial correlation analysis, the influence of # uAUG on d N became only marginally significant ( P = 0.01, based on # uAUG of C. reinhardtii genes; P = 0.04, based on # uAUG of V. carteri genes) ( table 2 ), whereas ExpLev mRNA remained significantly negatively correlated with d N (ρ p = −0.276, P < 10 − 63 ) and d N / d S (ρ p = −0.128, P < 10 − 13 ) ( table 2 ).

Collapsing over SOAs, the overall effect of 13 ms was only marginally significant, F 1 (1, 90)=12.43, p <01; F 2 (1, 21)=3.59, p =.07.

Interestingly there were three SNPs in GSN (rs10985196, rs7046030 and rs12683459), all highly correlated with pairwise r 2 values >0.90, which were highly significant (trend P<10 −6 ) in Sample Set 2 but only marginally significant in Sample Set 1 (trend P = 0.01–0.05).

These commonly connected pathways are also perturbed in ASD except that they are only marginally significant ( P = 0.01 to 0.10, table S2).

The differences between lymphocyte percentage at pre-infection and at LTBI endpoint were only marginally significant ( p = 0.01), but the differences between pre-infection and ATB were found to be far more significant ( p = 0.0001, Figure 4 , Supplementary Figure S2 ).

In a multivariate model using all variables homozygosity was only marginally significant ( p > 0.01).

This pattern of increased autosomal expression was strongest in the unfiltered data set (Wilcoxon tests; female P = 1.52 × 10 −6 ; male P = 5.78 × 10 −5 ), but average expression differences and strength of significance reduced rapidly with a small increase in filtering threshold: Although differences were significant when filtering at 2 FPKM (female P = 6.26 × 10 −6 ; male P = 2.02 × 10 −4 ), they were only marginally significant at 3 FPKM (female P = 0.01; male P = 0.05) and nonsignificant when filtering at 4 FPKM (female P = 0.12; male P = 0.96; fig. 2 b ; table 1 ; supplementary figs.

However, trait anger only marginally significantly predicted participants’ risk preference (OR = 1.09, p < 0.01).

While this effect was only marginally significant after correction, it was replicated in the PP analysis ( β = -1.49, 95% CI: -2.62 to -0.36, p = 0.01, adjusted p = 0.023, d = 0.38) ( Supplementary Material 6 ).

In the multivariate model, living in severe poverty was only marginally significant ( p < 0.01) associated with having increased odds of having experienced a most unsafe abortion.

Presence of an actively feeding larval stage consistently displayed the lowest effect size of the three factors, was not significantly associated with the shape of the nasal, stapes or dorsal sphenethmoid, and was only marginally significant (0.05 > p > 0.01) for the otic, maxilla and quadratojugal.

In this case, the effect size remains similar ( β 1 =−0.0033, s.e.=0.0013), but is only marginally significant ( P =0.0101, F -test).

The CD‐based SJT score correlated more strongly than the HH‐based SJT score with the honesty–humility subscale, but this difference was only marginally significant ( t (173) =−2.54, p = 0.011, d = 0.39).

Differences by SES quintile were only marginally significant for non-Hispanic Black patients (p = 0.0119 & 0.0158).

Gender also played a role, with a higher prevalence of GERD symptoms observed in men (49.0%, n = 255) compared to women (47.8%, n = 210), though this was only marginally significant (p = 0.012).

In contrast, the difference in enrichment for non-LMB domains between human proteins targeted by viruses and generic human proteins is only marginally significant (Fold enrichment = 0.96; P = 0.012; Figure 5 ), suggesting that the observed enrichment for LMB domains among human proteins targeted by viruses is not a simple result of superior domain annotation among these proteins.

In fact, we observed a highly significant treatment effect on JA in the entire dataset and also when analysing each genotype with individual ANOVAs, while we detected only marginally significant differences among the mutants and the WT ( Figure 4B , p = 0.012 for genotype and p = 0.453 for the interaction).

Although this result is only marginally significant after Bonferroni correction (adjusted threshold p < 0.0125), it still suggests a potentially relevant sex-based difference that should be explored in future case–control studies with larger sample sizes.