those who were still considered children) revealed an upward trend in pregnancy experience, from 3.3% in 2003, to 4.3% in 2008, and 5.0% in 2013, but this was only marginally significant ( P = 0.051).
← all phrases
“only marginally significant”
Sighted at
p<1.0p=0.9
In the literature
The main effect of electrode position was only marginally significant ( F (1.30, 36.49) = 3.72, p = 0.051, η p 2 = 0.12).
However, the model was only marginally significant (χ 2 (9, N = 149) = 16.850, p = 0.051) in the girls’ sample.
About half of the cases were treated with antibiotics but the difference between cases with positive and negative cultures was only marginally significant (p = 0.051).
The interaction between stimulus type and retention interval was only marginally significant ( F 8,104 = 2.02, p = 0.051).
We designed a statistical test to compare the rates of strata formation (expressed in event per My) taking into account the respective divergence times in the haplorrhine and strepsirrhine parts of the phylogenetic tree of the studied species, but this test was only marginally significant (binomial test, p=0.051 see Materials and methods).
Additionally, more than 70% of male and female students reported that their roommates engaged in similar online entertainment activities, but the difference between the moderate and severe IA group and the normal group was only marginally significant (p=0.051) ( Table 3 ).
Although this difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.051), this observation is still worth noting.
However, these differences were only marginally significant (P=0.051, Figure 3A ).
The main effect of Group was only marginally significant (F 1,111 = 3.88; p = 0.051; pƞ 2 = 0.03).
The interaction was only marginally significant (F (4,40) = 3.057, p = 0.051).
Leaf out was delayed 1.83 days (SE 0.69) in thermokarst troughs compared to thermokarst tops ( t 55 = 2.66, P = 0.049) but presented 1.32 days (SE 0.50) earlier in thermokarst tops than control tops, though this was also found to be only marginally significant ( t 55 = 2.64, P = 0.051).
Differences in participants’ graduation were only marginally significant, χ 2 (1) = 0.52, p = .051.
There were no statistically significant differences in call rates for arc chirps, tonal chirps, or upsweeps between seasons in Humboldt (Table 3 ); however, there tended to be a greater rate of trills in summer with a large effect size ( r = .52), although only marginally significant ( p = .051).
With regard to conditions classic and reduced , the main effect of Illumination was only marginally significant ( p = .051 and p = .059, respectively).
We observed that patients with the FF genotype had higher GH levels after treatment than patients with ff genotype, but the difference was only marginally significant ( P = 0.051).
Mean epigenetic diversity across loci also differs in both measures, though this difference is only marginally significant for uh when using a p value cutoff of 0.05 (uh: Kruskal–Wallis, χ 2 3 = 7.769, P = 0.051; SD: Kruskal–Wallis, χ 2 3 = 36.543, P < 0.001, Fig. 2 C, D ).
The final reduced model explained 27% of variability; however, the effect of the weight category was only marginally significant ( p = 0.0511), while the real health risk to humans remained insignificant.
Although there was a tendency for, overall, fewer mosquitoes to land when exposed to looming squares, this effect was only marginally significant (Generalized linear model: p = 0.0514; Fig. 2 C).
The change induced by knockdown of HDAC3 was only marginally significant ( P = 0.05154).
Unsurprisingly, populations with lower percentage of vegetarians have greater life expectancy, though the relationship is only marginally significant likely due to small sample size ( r =−0.303, p=0.0518, n=30).
We note, though, that the impact of oxytocin on advantageous inequity aversion was weaker than the effects of other task-specific experimental manipulations (e.g., Inequity amount) and would have been only marginally significant (p = 0.052) with a two-tailed test.
The rmANOVA with a Greenhouse–Geisser correction showed that the main effect of resource amount on the acceptance rate was only marginally significant, F (1.277, 72.791) = 3.601, p = 0.052, η p 2 = 0.059 (Fig. 3 A; Supplementary Table S2 and S3 for further detail).
10 , standardized effect = −0.30, p = 0.003,), but the effect became only marginally significant when permutations were restricted to within urbanization levels (standardized effect size = −0.14, p = 0.052).
The time required to capture the first prey item decreased substantially between the lowest and highest temperatures (19°C: 29.9±57.1 s, 24°C: 56.2±83.4 s, 29°C: 8.6±15.4 s; mean ± s.d.) although this relationship was not straightforward and was only marginally significant (GLM χ 2 = 5.92, d.f. = 2, P = 0.052).