“only marginally significant”

LNFP III exhibited a gradual decrease over time in Se+/Le+ and Se−Le+ milk ( p < 0.001), with only marginally significant change observed in Se+/Le− milk ( p = 0.051).

The main effect of Group was only marginally significant (F 1,111 = 3.88; p = 0.051; pƞ 2 = 0.03).

livia , but both effects were only marginally significant ( p = 0.051 and p = 0.075, respectively; Table 3 ).

In addition, children’s early externalizing behaviors were positively related to the intercept of using media to keep children busy (although this relationship was only marginally significant), β = 0.24, S.E. = 0.12, p = 0.051, and parent education was negatively related to the intercept of using media to calm children, β = −0.22 S.E. = 0.10, p = 0.022, as well as educational purposes, β = 0.01, S.E. = 0.10, p = 0.029.

The only other tract in which behavioral improvement was associated with FA changes was the right SLF-FP, but this effect was only marginally significant ( r = 0.466, p = 0.051, n = 18, 95 % confidence interval, bootstrapped from 1,000 samples: 0.066–0.747 s; Supplementary Fig. 2, Online Resource 4).

Further, 3-year-old girls learned more words when they dragged the named objects ( M = 3.98, SE = 0.38) than when they simply watched the objects move without interacting with the screen ( M = 2.78, SE = 0.30), although this 1.20-word difference was only marginally significant, 95% CI [-0.003, 2.41], p = 0.051.

candida were smaller at 25 °C for quantiles 0.85 and 0.95, although this effect was only marginally significant for the 0.95 quantile ( P = 0.051; Fig. 4A ; Table S6 ).

Regarding nationality, non-Saudis (52%) use specific services more frequently than Saudis (40%), but this difference is only marginally significant ( P = 0.051).

In multivariate analysis, pretreatment D-dimer level was the only marginally significant risk factor associated with VTE development (hazard ratio = 1.32; 95%CI: 1.00-1.75, P = 0.051).

While the rate of successful reperfusion was only marginally significant at 83.3% for patients with a good outcome compared to 50.0% for those with a poor outcome ( p = 0.051), the rate of successful reperfusion of newly embolized territory was significantly higher in the good outcome group (91.7%) than in the poor outcome group (30.8%, p < 0.001), with shorter procedure time (53 ± 27 min vs. 113 ± 55 min, respectively, p < 0.001).

Indeed, the 8.5 entrainment group showed a higher, albeit only marginally significant, TFR relative to the 11.5 Hz group (11.5 Hz group: mean = 0.32, SD = 0.12; 8.5 Hz group: mean = 0.39, SD = 0.13; t (58) = −2.00, p = 0.051).

Our mediation analysis further revealed that the association between age and optimism bias was mediated by negative learning rate (path ab: M = -0.02, SE = 0.01, z = -3.44, p < 0.001), and the association between age and optimism bias was substantially diminished and remained only marginally significant when accounting for negative learning rate (path c’: M = -0.04, SE = 0.02, z = -1.96, p = 0.051).

Including cardiorespiratory fitness (VO 2peak ) as covariate in the interaction analysis revealed significant activations in the same clusters as in the original model (except for the cluster peaking in the left supramarginal gyrus, which remained only marginally significant (p = 0.051)).

Further exploration of this association with a Mann-Whitney reduced this finding to only marginally significant ( p = 0.051).

With regard to conditions classic and reduced , the main effect of Illumination was only marginally significant ( p = .051 and p = .059, respectively).

Leaf out was delayed 1.83 days (SE 0.69) in thermokarst troughs compared to thermokarst tops ( t 55 = 2.66, P = 0.049) but presented 1.32 days (SE 0.50) earlier in thermokarst tops than control tops, though this was also found to be only marginally significant ( t 55 = 2.64, P = 0.051).

For Caucasian participants ( Fig 3B ) the main effect of format was only marginally significant, F (2,70) = 3.10, MSE = 0.89, p = .051,η p 2 = .08.

These effects appeared to develop over time, although the statistical interaction between day and treatment was only marginally significant (N = 37, χ 2 = 11.02, df = 5, p=0.051; Supplementary file 13 ).

The difference between invalid and neutral cue trials (M = 505.63, SEM = 10.10) was only marginally significant (t 34 = 2.02, p = .051, r 2 = .11) ( Fig 2C ).

In the final model, the regression coefficient was reduced by 35% from 0.782 to 0.510 and was only marginally significant ( p = 0.051).

The Speech Type × Age Group interaction was also significant (F 1,159 = 38.141, p = 5.3 × 10 −9 , and ω 2 = 0.107), because middle-aged to older adults categorized Wavenet speech more frequently as human speech than younger adults (t 159 = 6.434, p = 1.4 × 10 −9 , and d = 1.017) and human speech less frequently as human speech, although this was only marginally significant (t 159 = 1.962, p = 0.051, and d = 0.310).

those who were still considered children) revealed an upward trend in pregnancy experience, from 3.3% in 2003, to 4.3% in 2008, and 5.0% in 2013, but this was only marginally significant ( P = 0.051).

However, in women ( n = 66), the trend was only marginally significant (TJT = 614.5, p = 0.051).

Unlike bacteria, the direct effect of RAI was larger and positive, yet only marginally significant ( β RAI → BFratio direct = 0.810 , p = .051).

We also found a moderate positive relationship between Gas6 and EGFR post-treatment values, but the correlation was only marginally significant (r = 0.442, p = 0.051).