“only marginally significant”

They found that the peripapillary CT was slightly greater in OHT, but age-adjusted comparisons between the groups indicated that this difference was only marginally significant (p=0.059).

The Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed a statistical significance in increase of marginal gap after firing in both Cast group ( P =.012) and SLS group ( P =.007), while only marginally significant or insignificant results were obtained for internal gap in Cast group ( P =.059) or SLS group ( P >.05), respectively ( Table 1 ).

While the interaction between genotype and these stressors was only marginally significant ( p = 0.059) and warrants a cautious interpretation, this qualitative shift resulted in similar fertilisation probabilities across genotypes ( Figure 2 ).

Block 1 brought only marginally significant explanatory value to addictive tendencies ( F (5, 254) = 2.16, p = .059), and none of the demographic variables emerged as a significant factor in Block 1.

However, this difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.059).

However, no reliable difference was found between conditions for script-consistent events, M experienced = 1.91, SD experienced = 1.44; M hypothetical = 2.18, SD hypothetical = 1.89, U (15, 14) = 77.50, z = −1.20, p = 0.230 (two-tailed), effect size r = 0.22, and the difference was only marginally significant for script-divergent events, M experienced = −0.77, SD experienced = 1.81; M hypothetical = −1.74, SD hypothetical = 1.98, U (15, 15) = 67.00, z = −1.89, p = 0.059 (two-tailed), effect size r = 0.34.

A similar pattern was observed with PHQ‐9 scores (Figure 4c,g,k,o,s ), although the association with the AMY was only marginally significant ( p = 0.059).

The FC strength of the Precuneus correlated only marginally significant with the size of the relative defect ( r = 0.48, p = 0.059), and not with the other two sub-areas (absolute defect: r = -0.14, p = 0.55; minimal-no defect: r = 0.01, p = 0.98). 4.

In the Polish condition, we found similar results; however, the slope was only marginally significant ( b 2 = 0.34, p =.059), a 3 was not significant.

ID) was only marginally significant, r = −.297, p = .059 ( positive theta effect averaged over 16 parietal significant electrodes).

It must be noted however, that among boys, the effect of risk perception was only marginally significant ( p = 0.059).

And the effect of SD duration was primarily influenced by studies employing short duration protocols, although this effect was only marginally significant (estimate/β = 5.5427, p = 0.0590, Supplemental Table 10 ).

In the fully adjusted model, the RR was further reduced and was only marginally significant (RR: 1.20, p = .059).

However, a similar difference between the fast stress and slow stress condition ( M = 72.30, SD = 9.68) was only marginally significant, t (7) = 2.25, p = .059.

We originally hypothesized that replacing the RTS with lactate levels in the TRISS model would improve the predictive value of the model; however, our analyses revealed that the improvement was only marginally significant (P=0.059).

After further adjustment for gender, subclass and thymectomy this interaction was only marginally significant (p = 0.059).

Although the main effect of tweet condition on IBI responses was only marginally significant ( p = 0.059; Table 4 ), planned contrast for positive and negative versus no tweets reached statistical significance ( p = 0.028).

The regression model with language, choice, and need for autonomy, and their interactions as independent variables was only marginally significant for counterarguing as dependent variable, F counterarguing (7,419) = 1.96, p = .059.

1A ); however, this difference was only marginally significant (median, 345.5 L/min; IQR = 291.8–423.2 L/min vs. median, 375.1 L/min; IQR = 319.7–485.7 L/min; P = 0.059).

OS also decreased in patients with triple-negative or HER-2 overexpressing subtypes, but this was only marginally significant ( P = 0.0597).

In the large plots, the abundance of ants was reduced by the treatment in both 2010 and 2011, although in 2010, this effect was only marginally significant (F 1,4 = 6.78, p = 0.0598).

A post-hoc correlation of the difference in dyad scores with variant as a collapsed binary variable (non-fluent PPA vs other PPA) revealed a moderate but only marginally significant relationship (Rho = −.452, P = .06).

Interestingly, after adjustment for HIV− and CVD‐related risk factors, the prevalence ratios of coronary artery stenosis above 50% associated with each SD increase in values of IL‐6, hs‐CRP, and D‐dimer in our study were comparable to the hazard ratios reported in the SMART trial, 56 although the association of hs‐CRP with coronary artery stenosis was only marginally significant ( P =0.06) and the relationship of D‐dimer with coronary artery stenosis was not statistically significant.

In 1997, a second official study reported a 50% increased leukemia risk for this target group, which was only marginally significant ( P = 0.060).

The predictability effects were significant at FCZ, CZ, CPZ, and PZ ( p s < 0.0001), but only marginally significant at Fz ( p = 0.06).