“only marginally significant”

This pattern was only marginally significant for SCLs (0.37% of X-linked and 0.91% of autosomal genes, Fisher’s exact test, P = 0.02).

healthy groups, pattern recognition analysis was only marginally significant for the pattern of regional cerebral blood flow across voxels at rest in the rostral/perigenual ACC (BA24) subdivision ( P = 0.02).

All models showed statistical significance (p < 0.0001); however the age term was not significant for model 1 (p = 0.4454), only marginally significant for model 2 (p = 0.0202), and significant for the remaining models (p < 0.0001).

The effect of age was minor and only marginally significant, with post hoc tests revealing differences between the “seldom” and “always” groups ( p = 0.021) and the “often” and “always” groups ( p = 0.007).

Although the 4- and 5-class models further reduced information criteria (e.g., 4-class: AIC = 19,578.31; 5-class: AIC = 18,983.54), both yielded minimal classes (2.62% and 1.11%, respectively), undermining stability and interpretability, and their VLMR/BLRT results were only marginally significant (4-class: VLMR p = .021; 5-class: VLMR p = .021).

However, the Lo–Mendell–Rubin likelihood ratio test (LMR-LRT) showed that the 2-class latent profile model significantly improved over the 1-class model ( p < 0.001), the 3-class model significantly improved over the 2-class model ( p < 0.001), but the 4-class model was only marginally significant over the 3-class model ( p = 0.021), and the 5-class model was not significant over the 4-class model ( p = 0.131).

Interestingly, although the risk of COVID-19 infection between sexes was only marginally significant (OR, 1.15; P = .021), males were at a substantially higher risk of requiring ventilation (OR, 2.99; P = 1.6 × 10 −8 ).

Motif analysis suggests that the former explanation is likely to make, at best, a minor contribution, since enrichment for Su(H) motifs in the Hairless-only regions was only marginally significant (rank 407, p = 0.022).

However, neither Tajima's nor Fu & Li's tests provided evidence of departures from neutrality and calculations of the McDonald-Kreitman test identified only marginally significant departures in French Guiana ( P = 0.022) and in Senegal ( P = 0.010).

COVID-19 vaccine risk Interestingly, while vaccine refusers appear to perceive more risk from the vaccine than those who have or will have the vaccine, the difference from the “will” group was only marginally significant for collective risk, p = .022, and non-significant for personal risk.

Monocyte counts were slightly higher in the stone group (0.35 × 10^9/L), but this was only marginally significant ( P = 0.023).

However, the interaction GMTxRCS was associated with a higher EQ-VAS, although only marginally significant ( p = 0.024, Table 2 e).

However, the difference between these two trial types was only marginally significant, M diff = 31.2 ms, t (572.4) = 0.94, p = .0245, β z = 0.02.

The 30–34 age group had the shortest mean wayfinding time and was faster than the ≥35 age group, although this was only marginally significant, t (43) = −2.317, p = 0.025.

Though the combinatorial density of sub-adults was lower than adults, at 0.38, this was only marginally significant (i.e. p > 0.025) after controlling for number of nodes ( p = 0.031, randomized density mean 0.42 ± 0.04, 95% CI [0.42–0.43], randomized range 0.28–0.53).

The contrast was only marginally significant ( F (1, 129) = 5,130, p = 0.025, η p 2 = .038) when applying the set cutoff to post-hoc tests.

Of note, although the P value of the chi-square test for work experience was only marginally significant, the Armitage trend test revealed a significant linear trend in the rate of injury (P=0.025).

As seen, the deficits in FFM and FFMI among children included by WLZ-O compared to MUAC-O were greater among stunted compared to non-stunted children, although only marginally significant for the FFMI (interactions non-stunted children vs stunted children and admission criteria with respect to FFM, p = 0.025, and FFMI, p = 0.078).

Leg lean mass was lower in the LC group but only marginally significant at baseline, mean 14,526 ± 3464 g vs. 16,156 ± 3655 g in the WR group ( p = 0.026), and not at follow-up, the LC group 14,629 ± 3686 g vs. 15,863 ± 3585 g for the WR group ( p = 0.132) [ Table 3 ].

The main effect of test temperature was only marginally significant ( P = 0.026; Table 1 ), but LD 50 values were greater in the cool test treatment (Fig. 1(b) ; Table 2 ).

A history of mental health problems was significant in bivariate analysis, but was only marginally significant ( p = 0.026) when covariates were included.

Although the Impulsivity x Task Version x Deck selection interaction can be considered only marginally significant ( F (3,468) = 3.56, η 2 = 0.02, p = 0.027, see Figure 4 ) after the p -level correction (significance threshold: p = 0.008), it did help in qualifying the Impulsivity x Deck Selection interaction.

Test number was only marginally significant ( F 7,49 = 2.53, P = 0.027) and there was no statistically significant interaction between test number and feed treatment ( Fig 4 ).

The effect of water-filled hopper is only marginally significant in the final model (p = 0.027), so the emphasis on this result feels overstated. 2.

Given that this effect is only marginally significant (p = 0.0272), the concern is that worry these parameters may have been selected to drop the p-value below the "significance" threshold, and would not survive multiple comparison correction should the window be expanded. 4) The reviewers struggled with the rationale of the decoding approach.