“only marginally significant”

The same pattern was found for salary increase, but the conditional indirect effect was only marginally significant (interaction: c = −0.22, p = 0.028; −1 SD : cie = 0.11, p = 0.093; 0: cie = 0.04, p = 0.401; +1 SD : cie = −0.02, p = 0.679).

Likewise, the qpWave test of cladality is only marginally significant between the early Medieval and present‐day Koreans ( p = 0.029 for SGDP Korean and p = 0.030 for Ulsan Korean; Table S4 ).

The differences between warm and recovery phase were only marginally significant ( p < 0.03) for trial 3 samples.

melanogaster nuclear backgrounds, a similar trend was observed but was only marginally significant when corrected for multiple comparisons (Level of significance: 0.0125; YW-BNE: F 1,52 = 5.3, P = 0.03; w 1118 : F 1,50 = 2.98, P = 0.09; Table S1 ).

The difference is not statistically significant in strains with the F orientation, and is only marginally significant (P = 0.03) in the R orientation.

IRLE’s Life Events’ Impacts The ANOVA for the number of events reported by the groups in the IRLE showed only marginally significant differences (F2,157 = 3.44; p = 0.03).

In addition, the difference between the PLD and LMS groups was only marginally significant ( p = 0.03) (Fig. 6a ).

The apparent reduction in deaths attributed to other medical causes in participants originally allocated simvastatin (200 [2·3%] vs 239 [2·8%]) was only marginally significant (p=0·03) and involved no material differences in deaths due to renal or hepatic disease and only a non-significant difference in a miscellaneous group of other non-vascular causes.

First, gamma is only marginally significant (Table 2 ; p = 0.03).

In the 2004–2016 sample, accumulation remained the strongest predictor, while PA‐2016 was only marginally significant ( p = 0.03).

Even when SDOH features are already included, the incremental benefit of adding temperature remains limited—statistically non-significant for younger children (p = 0.44) and only marginally significant for adolescents (p = 0.03).

Preregistered analysis of reaction times When analyzing all trials, the congruency main effect was only marginally significant, following the TreeBH correction, according to which the critical alpha level for these analyses was 0.025 ( F (1,56) = 6.56, P = .030, BF 10 = 2.37).

The correlation between ancestral GC content and divergence was much weaker and only marginally significant for D. melanogaster (Spearman's ρ = −0.05, p = 0.03).

As shown, overlap of genes showing both higher H3K9ac and H3K4me3 in the same species was only marginally significant (hypergeometric test, p≈0.03), and clearly, the overwhelming majority of genes (c. 85%) did not concur ( Figure 2F ).

The composite error showed only marginally significant improvement over the null ( p = 0.030, borderline at α = 0.05).

T2 was also enriched by tofacitinib treatment; however, the statistical overlap was only marginally significant ( P = 0.03) (fig.

Thresholds of tolerance: The referees rated the midline 1 mm off to the right as the most appealing one; the zone of acceptability also comprised the ‘on’ midline, the midline off to the left for 1 mm (Bonferroni, level of significance = 0.008, both P values = 1.0, Table 9 ) as well as 2 mm deviation to the right, which was only marginally significant ( P = 0.030, Table 9 ).

However, after multivariable adjustment for all covariates, the association was attenuated and only marginally significant (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.96, p=0.0304).

Specifically, the mediation analysis revealed a possible pathway that IL-2RB exerts its causal effect on CDC through spermidine-to-choline ratio, though the causal effect of IL-2RB on spermidine-to-choline ratio was only marginally significant ( P = .031), which needs to be further validated in larger cohorts.

However without covariates this analysis was only marginally significant (p = 0.031).

eleginoides , the difference in THg between MSC-certified and uncertified fish was only marginally significant at the 0.05 level and not significantly different at the 0.0167 level (t-test for unequal variances: t = −2.15, one-tailed p = 0.0320).

A multivariate regression analysis suggested that cases with detectable viral load (ie, >35 copies/mL) had a DNA methylation age that was on average 3.6 years greater than that of adult male cases with a nondetectable viral load, but the association was only marginally significant ( P = .033) and requires further validation studies.

Diagnostic confidence was similar at 3 T with better but non-significant differences for T2 ( p = 0.134) and at 1.5 T with better but non-significant differences for non-contrast-enhanced T1 ( p = 0.083) and only marginally significant results for FLAIR ( p = 0.033).

This heterogeneity in B-factor across the nucleosomal DNA resulted in a very weak rotational periodicity (∼10.5 bp) that was only marginally significant ( P = 0.0338; Supplementary Fig.

The differentiation between African and Asian populations (AFR_ASN) was only marginally significant (p-value = 0.034) and no significantly increased differentiation was observed between Asian and European populations (ASN_EUR) or within the three continental populations. 3.2.3 Branch length analysis Our second analysis estimated phylogenetic branch lengths using OLS and ML.