The differentiation between African and Asian populations (AFR_ASN) was only marginally significant (p-value = 0.034) and no significantly increased differentiation was observed between Asian and European populations (ASN_EUR) or within the three continental populations. 3.2.3 Branch length analysis Our second analysis estimated phylogenetic branch lengths using OLS and ML.
← all phrases
“only marginally significant”
Sighted at
p<1.0p=0.9
In the literature
The difference was only marginally significant with mycorrhiza helper (R 2 = 0.29, P = 0.034), but no significant difference was detected with the root parasite.
Patients with high MAGEB2 expression exhibited a 20% increased risk of death, although this effect was weaker relative to other MAGEs and only marginally significant [adjusted HR = 1.20 (95% CI: 1.01–1.42), p = 0.034].
In contrast, under low transparency conditions, the difference in anxiety between the high AI group (M = 15.11, SD = 2.28) and the low AI group (M = 17.17, SD = 2.36) was smaller and only marginally significant (t = 2.13, p = 0.035, Cohen’s d = 0.47).
This difference, though only marginally significant (two-sided Welch’s t -test, p- value = 0.035), suggests that nonsynonymous mutations that arose during the STLE were under stronger positive selection than those that occurred by non-homologous recombination.
Nevertheless, the association between the gr/gr deletions and male infertility in the Mongolian populations was only marginally significant (p-value = 0.035).
There were significant differences in the number of clutches between males and females, while differences in the number of mates were only marginally significant (Mann–Whitney U- test, N m/f = 93/77, clutches: U = 2919, P = 0.035; mates: U = 3000, P = 0.064).
Those without showed only marginally significant global cognition impairment (SMD = −0.3424, p = 0.0351). 3.4 Publication Bias and Sensitivity Analysis In the disease‐cognitive impairment correlation analysis, the funnel plot (Figure S6 ) and Egger's test explicitly confirmed significant publication bias ( P = 0.017).
6 c , the gain due to C n is only marginally significant: p = 0.036 for both animals and p = 0.121, p = 0.096 for Monkeys 1 and 2, respectively, Wilcoxon signed rank tests, and nonsignificant for paired t tests.) In contrast, prediction performance is not significantly increased when including the preceding spike count ( S n -1 ) after choice history and the current spike count ( Fig. 6 b ).
There was a trend for larger activation volumes of the pPHG regions on Scanner 2 compared to Scanner 1, although this was only marginally significant ( p -value = 0.036) for the Left pPHG ROI on day 1.
The correlation of 5′ UTR with DM in YEPD was the weakest and after controlling for tAI or TATA was only marginally significant ( p -value = 0.0366 and p -value = 0.0134 respectively).
thaliana , considering the entire dataset, the test is only marginally significant after correcting for multiple testing ( P = 0.037; q = 0.055).
cingulata haplotypes were removed to see if their low intraspecific divergence was pulling the between/within-species threshold closer to the present, the GMYC algorithm diagnosed nearly every haplotype of the remaining species as an independent population lineage, although the results were only marginally significant (null likelihood = 141.2776, GMYC likelihood = 145.5174, P < 0.037).
Mental fatigue also independently predicted COMPASS total score, but the effect was small and only marginally significant (β=0.12, p=0.037) ( table 2 ).
The logistic regression demonstrated only marginally significant protective effects of both age, Wald χ 2 (1) = 4.37, Exp ( B ) = 0.96, p = .037, and marital status, Wald χ 2 (1) = 3.86, Exp ( B ) = 0.42, p = .049.
Increasing the OP-1 dose for up to 5 μ g/mL did not enhance its inhibitory activity; with 0.2 μ g/mL inhibition was on average 20.0 ± 7.9% and only marginally significant ( P = 0.038).
These results were consistent across all classification schemes except 6-McL, where despite a significant difference in overall climate (Z = 2.651, p = 0.010), PC1 was only marginally significant (Z = 2.219, p = 0.038, sequential Bonferroni-adjusted α = 0.010), and PC2 was not significant (Z = 1.280, p = 0.127; S3 Table ; see Discussion ).
The difference in employing benefit-focused frames was only marginally significant across newspapers (χ 2 = 4.30, p = 0.038).
Lastly, two previously effects that were only marginally significant under parametric testing reached significance under non-parametric testing: the median direction noise (°) was lower (8.4%, W (16) = −75, p = 0.0389) and median direction asymmetry higher (58.3%, W (16) = 76, p = 0.0485) with binocular viewing.
The top model included additional effects of snake size ( Σw SVL = 1.00 and Σ w SVL 2 = 0.61 ) and body condition ( Σw CI = 0.61), although p‐values for these terms were only marginally significant or nonsignificant ( p = 0.039, 0.080, and 0.080, respectively).
In contrast, only maximum height showed a nonzero correlation with Eucalyptus growth rate in the genus slopes model; growth rate increased only in taller Eucalyptus species, and this slope was only marginally significant compared to null expectations ( p = 0.039).
As for the government’s perceived effectiveness, the GLM analysis confirmed the main effect of wave, although it was only marginally significant (F 1, 2166 = 4.275; p = 0.039; η p 2 = 0.002).
Consistent with this finding, although sampling of ordinal trees was indeed moderately negatively correlated with the percent of species that were tropical ( ρ = −0.2029), this trend was only marginally significant ( F -test: two-tailed p = 0.0397).
Moreover, when considering the mean percent of contributing pairs as a threshold to separate good from poor years, more pairs contributed to the production of young during good years (49.82±1.98%) than poor years (40.84±3.59%), but the difference between the number of pairs was only marginally significant ( t = −4.03, p = 0.04).
The comparison between grade and clinical response when the tumor fDM did not change was only marginally significant ( P = .04).