“only marginally significant”

The toileting variable was highly significant in the sample of 65 facilities but only marginally significant (p = .083) in the sample of 74 facilities.

Likelihood ratio tests indicated that the effect of temperature was only marginally significant during the time before sunrise (χ 2 = 3.02, P = 0.083) and not significant during the time after sunset (χ 2 = 2.63, P = 0.104).

It is noteworthy that snow depth and calf recruitment were negatively correlated in three time windows, though only marginally significant so (January–March: P = 0.083, February–April: P = 0.068, March–May: P = 0.067). 4 DISCUSSION Understanding the drivers of animal demographics and population size is essential in wildlife management and conservation.

However, our PERMANOVA results indicated that the anatomical phenotype root-cross section area (RXSA) was only marginally significant to the rhizosphere beta diversity ( P = 0.083, F 1,5 = 1.65; R 2 = 0.29) of the grassland mixture.

However, the difference between the high and low probability location was only marginally significant, t (23) = 1.81, p = .083, d = 0.27.

On the other two data sets, the signature achieves much higher accuracy (> 75%) than that of coin-flipping but only marginally significant ( p -value = 0.083 and 0.107).

Reading speed was on average slower in the children categorized as having OMD (DEM Type 2 and 4 groups, n = 8) relative to the children categorized as having normal oculomotor function (DEM Type 1 group, n = 9), but this difference was only marginally significant ( t (9.54) = −1.5, p = 0.083, 1-tailed, see Figure 5 a).

The knockdown for CG4836 showed no significant downregulation compared with Curly flies carrying only the responder (t 6 = 0.80; P = 0.231) and CG14891 was only marginally significant (t 7 = 1.77; P = 0.083), with all other gene knockdowns showing significant reductions in gene expression relative to controls ( Figure 4 ).

Overall warming increased ER by 12%, but the effect was only marginally significant ( p = 0.083).

For irreversible bending rate, on the other hand, because of much greater variation in the data a difference between hardwoods and softwoods was only marginally significant (mean for hardwoods 2.30 ± 0.286 % per h and for softwoods 1.13 ± 0.083; 1-way ANOVA, F 1,197 = 3.0343, P = 0.0831).

The following two pairs were only marginally significant: 18–34 years compared with 55 years and above ( P = 0.084) and 35–54 years compared with 55 years and above ( P = 0.084).

The relationship between seed viability and seed production across the treatment level was positive, but only marginally significant ( X 2 = 2.9, p = 0.084).

Our segmentation had suggested that, at a group level, pro-cue switch and cue task-stay trials could be distinguished on the basis of these two topographies, however the fitting result suggested that this was, at best, only marginally significant at a within-subject level [F(1,13) = 3.489, p = 0.084].

In a separate greenhouse study, fungicide reduced total biomass by ∼10%, but this effect was only marginally significant ( P = 0.084; Table S1A ; Fig.

Mann-Whitney tests also showed a significant difference between the 3D Head and 3D Plant (Mann-Whitney U = 1258.5, p = .016) but the difference between the 3D Head and 2D Head was only marginally significant (Mann-Whitney U = 1269, p = .084).

The ROI analyses based on the four-group model (all subgroups of EB and LB) revealed only marginally significant Group × Training effect on BOLD signal changes in the left precuneus (F 3,21 = 2.556, P = 0.084, ƞ 2 = 0.277).

In an analogous model, IEAA is only marginally significant (p=0.084, Table 2 ).

high = 0.24, p = 0.116), but the difference was only marginally significant ( z -value Δ = 1.38, p = 0.084).

Regarding FoP, only marginally significant differences between patients (M = 30.81, SD = 7.53) and their spouses occurred [M = 34.29, SD = 9.39; t (20) = −1.82, P = 0.084].

Conversely, the frequency of efficacy posts was the lowest in the initial phase (65%), as compared with the pre-crisis (82%) and the maintenance (100%) phase, though the differences were only marginally significant ( χ 2 = 4.94, p = 0.084).

Although the main effect of Time was highly significant ( F = 100.403, p < 0.001), the main effect of Group was only marginally significant ( p = 0.084).

While the prevalence of HR HPV among patients not receiving HAART linearly increased with each decrease in CD4 count category (CD4 <200; CD4 200–349; CD4 350–499; and CD4≥500; PR for linear trend 5.03, p=0.025), this trend was only marginally significant among women receiving HAART for <2 years (prevalence ratio (PR) for linear trend 2.98, p=0.084) and insignificant for women on HAART therapy for ≥2 years (PR for linear trend 1.19, p=0.275).

However, this difference was only marginally significant (t(19) = 1.82, p = 0.084).

The time*evaluation order was only marginally significant ( F (1,62) = 3.079, p <.084, η 2 p = 0.047).

The effect of this interaction on promotion-serving support was only marginally significant (Table 4 in Appendix, Model 7, b = .13, p = .084).