Barely Significant
← all phrases

only marginally significant

5,077 sentences · 5,077 papers · 5,448 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<1.0p=0.9

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

only marginally significantp = 0.0851.7× alphagold
The interaction reflected a significant trial type effect for CSI 300 ms trials ( M = 435.55, SD = 98.94 for single-task, and M = 473.44, SD = 130.29 for non-switch trials, p < 0.001), and CSI 800 ms trials ( M = 389.98, SD = 35.14 for single-task, and M = 410.92, SD = 64.37 for non-switch trials, p = 0.02), whereas the difference between trial types was only marginally significant for CSI 600 ms trials ( M = 417.74, SD = 58.60 for single-task, and M = 433.45, SD = 85.01 for non-switch trials, p = 0.085).
only marginally significantp = 0.0851.7× alphagold
In the whole group, the MMP2 rs7201 C variant conferred an increased risk of locoregional recurrence ( p log-rank = 0.025, HR 1.55, p = 0.037; Figure 1 I), while the association of TIMP2 rs7501477 T allele with poor LRFS was only marginally significant ( p log-rank = 0.068, HR 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95–2.07, p = 0.085.
only marginally significantp = 0.0861.7× alphagold
All of the study’s main effects and interactions remained significant, apart from the interaction between student PLE and teacher school context efficacy on average class general distress that became only marginally significant with the inclusion of student gender as a covariate (B = −0.009, SE = 0.005, p = 0.086). 4.
only marginally significantp = 0.0861.7× alphagold
Multivariable Poisson regression with robust error variances revealed that females were approximately 2-times more likely to have had a self-reported needle-stick injury in the past compared to males (IR=1.95, CI: 0.91–4.18); however, this difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.086).
Needle-Stick Injuries in Ophthalmic Practice.
Risk Manag Healthc Policy · 2023 · PMC10460596
only marginally significantp = 0.0861.7× alphagold
Although the interaction between L2 proficiency and Condition was only marginally significant (the effect of L2 proficiency on the T2-T4 contrast vs. the T2-T3 contrast: β = −0.70, SE = 0.41, t = −1.72, p = 0.086), we nevertheless conducted post hoc pairwise comparisons because it was directly relevant to the aims of the present study.
only marginally significantp = 0.0861.7× alphagold
This association was not or only marginally significant when overweight (IRR = 1.27, 95% CI: 0.97–1.66, p = 0.086) and the combined measure of 4 food components (IRR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.04–2.06, p = 0.031) were used as indicators of unhealthy diet as part of the BHRF-score calculation.