Barely Significant
← all phrases

only marginally significant

5,077 sentences · 5,077 papers · 5,448 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<1.0p=0.9

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

only marginally significantp = 0.08841.8× alphagold
In the analysis of time alone, the positive linear increase across time became only marginally significant (β = 0.02, p = 0.0884) after adjusting for a significant positive AR1 autocorrelative term (β = 0.8716, p<0.0001; the Durbin-Watson test of lag 1 autocorrelation was significant before adjusting for the AR1, but not after); the autocorrelation term absorbed much of the variance due to the deviation from a straight-line trend.
only marginally significantp = 0.0891.8× alphagold
However, this result was only marginally significant ( F -test, p = 0.089, Supplementary Table S5 ) and once again the statistical significance was lost at 28 dpa ( Supplementary Table S6 ), even though the ratio in expression levels remained at approximately 10:1.
only marginally significantp = 0.0891.8× alphagold
In the first case, the perceived success of the student movement moderates the effect of reported current participation of the students (quasi experimental condition) over their intentions of participating in both normative and non-normative actions, although in the former the effect is only marginally significant, F (2,375) = 2.44, p = 0.089, η p 2 = 0.014 and F (2,375) = 3.29, p = 0.038, η p 2 = 0.018, respectively.
only marginally significantp = 0.0891.8× alphagold
The estimated difference between Afromestizo and Mestizo configurations is positive but only marginally significant (difference = 0.13, SE = 0.08, p = 0.089), while contrasts between Afromestizo and Mulato configurations are small and statistically indistinguishable from zero ( p = 0.38).
only marginally significantp = 0.091.8× alphagold
While the difference between the stuttering job candidates who did and did not acknowledge their speech dysfluency was only marginally significant, F (1, 51) = 2.92, p = 0.09, η p 2 = 0.05, for the impression question alone (acknowledgement: M = 5.50, SD = 1.29; no acknowledgement: M = 4.38, SD = 1.66), the difference was significant, F (1, 51) = 7.33, p = 0.01, η p 2 = 0.13.
only marginally significantp = .091.8× alphagold
The difference between the horizontal-hands (set 8: M = 2.61, SD = 1.22; set 12: M = 1.61, SD = 1.13) and the hands-off condition was only marginally significant under set 8 ( p = .09) and was not significant under set 12 ( p = .66).
Improved change detection with nearby hands.
Exp Brain Res · 2011 · PMC3041905