Barely Significant
← all phrases

only marginally significant

5,077 sentences · 5,077 papers · 5,448 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<1.0p=0.9

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

only marginally significantP = 0.091.8× alphagold
Further, the match > mismatch contrast seemed to characterize the decrease better than the linear contrast, which was only marginally significant (contrast M = 0.005, SD = 0.014, CI: [−0.001–0.012], t (18) = 1.76, P = 0.09, Cohen’s d = 0.40, see Fig. 3 ).
only marginally significantP = 0.091.8× alphagold
Again, paired comparisons showed that the CON group distinguished clearly between congruent and incongruent human hand trials [ t (16) = 4.01, P = 0.001; mean congruency difference M = 1.13 μV], while this effect was smaller and only marginally significant in the HFA group [ t (18) = 1.8, P = 0.09; mean congruency difference: M = 0.44μ].
only marginally significantp = 0.091.8× alphagold
By contrast, although all participants stated that the effects of MNS were to reduce their perceived urge-to-tic and that quantitative analysis of the continuous self-estimated urge-to-tic data showed an overall reduction in the self-estimated urge-to-tic during MNS of ∼33%, the difference between rhythmic MNS and no stimulation was only marginally significant (means for self-estimated tic-to-tic intensity: no stimulation = 41.3 ± 31.7, rhythmic MNS = 29.1 ± 20.7; t(15) = 1.83, p = 0.09, Figure 5 right).
only marginally significantp = .091.8× alphagold
The difference between the horizontal-hands (set 8: M = 2.61, SD = 1.22; set 12: M = 1.61, SD = 1.13) and the hands-off condition was only marginally significant under set 8 ( p = .09) and was not significant under set 12 ( p = .66).
Improved change detection with nearby hands.
Exp Brain Res · 2011 · PMC3041905
only marginally significantp = 0.091.8× alphagold
The difference in probability of choosing the common number between the Wait and NoWait treatments becomes only marginally significant (logit coeff. 0.15, z = 1.34, one-tailed p = 0.09) when dropping the participants who chose the common number in zero periods.
Do mturkers collude in interactive online experiments?
Behav Res Methods · 2024 · PMC11289075
only marginally significantp = 0.0901.8× alphagold
In univariable MR, genetically higher serum 25(OH)D levels were positively associated with AMM in all participants ( β = 0.049, SE = 0.024, p = 0.039) and males ( β = 0.057, SE = 0.025, p = 0.021), but only marginally significant in females ( β = 0.043, SE = 0.025, p = 0.090) based on IVW models was noticed.