Barely Significant
← all phrases

only marginally significant

5,077 sentences · 5,077 papers · 5,448 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<1.0p=0.9

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

For the species for which mite and domatia numbers were sufficiently variable to model, the number of domatia significantly positively predicted mite abundance in four cases ( Acer pensylvanicum , Acer rubrum , Betula papyrifera and Viburnum acerifolium ), whereas four species had only marginally significant positive relationships ( Acer saccharum , Fagus grandifolia , Tilia americana , and Vitis riparia ) , and four had no significant relationship ( Cornus rugosa, Fraxinus americana, Ostrya virginiana , and Quercus rubra ) . 4 Discussion Documenting the distribution of ecologically important traits within communities is a critical foundation for studies of the causes and consequences of ecological variation.
Although both groups showed significant improvements in FMA-UE and ARAT after training, the RBMT group showed only marginally significant improvement in BBT, while the RBT group did not show significant improvement.
In the current experiment, both semantic and pragmatic effects were registered within the first 200 ms, exhibiting interactions between semantic and pragmatic levels in the first two time windows, with most effects remaining only marginally significant by 400–500 ms, given that simple, predictable, psycholinguistically controlled single word stimuli were used.
Although the association of the Q152E variant with SLE was only marginally significant ( 81 ), of interest is that the Q152E substitution is located within the CD22 extracellular domain (at the interface between Ig domains 2 and 3) and introduces a charge difference; since it is located far from the SA-binding pocket, it is unlikely to directly affect CD22 binding to α2-6 sialylated ligands; however, this polymorphism might affect other aspects of CD22 biology such as stability, adhesion and trafficking.
The psychophysiological pattern of classification C (coherent trials that are correctly judged as coherent but without the participant's being able to offer a correct CA) points in the same direction as the patterns for classifications A and B: Lower SCRs can be found for intuition blocks than for deliberation blocks, although the difference is only marginally significant in this comparison (see Figure 4 ).
Another limitation is the small sample size or possible confounding because of which we might not have been able to detect statistically significant associations, as in the case of the association between the specimen type and MDR, which was only marginally significant.