Barely Significant
← all phrases

“showed a trend”

53,323 sentences · 53,323 papers · 65,371 search hits before verification

In the literature

showed a trendp = 0.0751.5× alpha
A significant effect of treatment for feeling ready to perform was identified [ F (2, 84.12) = 3.211, p = 0.045], with post-hoc comparisons identifying no significant difference between the active and placebo groups but the DHA-rich group (59.12) showed a trend towards being significantly less ready to perform than the EPA-rich group (66.65; p = 0.075) ( Figure 3 ).
showed a trendp = 0.0751.5× alpha
CG showed a trend for reductions in emotional eating, restrained eating and for clearly labelled emotions ( p = 0.075, p = 0.087, and p = 0.075, respectively) and with moderate effect sizes (−0.568, −0.543, −0.568, respectively).
showed a trendP = 0.0751.5× alpha
In the sensitivity analysis, xenopax showed a trend toward a better ORR at any time compared with BATs [82.6% (95% CI 76.9–88.3%) vs. 76.3% (95% CI 74.3–79.2%), P = 0.075], and the ORR at day 28 [64.5% (95% CI 57.3–71.7%) vs. 67.9% (95% CI 64.7–71.1%), P = 0.399] was similar between the groups in the propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.
showed a trendP <0.0751.5× alpha
For noise trials, the time period from −300 to −50 ms before the critical phoneme still showed a trend for above-chance classification accuracy (one-way t test t (5)=2.25, P <0.075, uncorrected), although it was less than when separate classifiers were trained over time ( Supplementary Fig. 10 ).
showed a trendp = 0.0751.5× alpha
However, as one might expect based on the fact that the handwriting measure was ranked-ordered and not standardized, even though the range of ages in these children were narrow (5–6 years of age), age showed a trend for significant positive association with handwriting [ r (44) = 0.27; p = 0.075], and gender effects were found [ t (44) = 2.64, p = 0.012] with boys demonstrating significantly weaker handwriting performance as compared to girls.
Patients with a high sPD-L1 level after CRT showed a trend for worse disease-free survival (DFS) than those with a low sPD-L1 level (p = 0.0752); although, the p-value did not reach statistical significance ( Fig 2B ).