“slightly significant”

Differences between AUC for SPISE-IR and AUC for each of the other indexes were slightly significant ( p < 0.02–0.01).

After surgery no new VSAs deficits were observed and a slightly significant improvement of the HVOT score (p=0.02) was documented.

Exemestane induced a non significant increase in the mean annual rate of BMD loss at lumbar spine with respect to placebo (2.17% vs 1.84%) and a slightly significant increase in femoral neck BMD (2.72% vs 1.48%; p = 0.02) ( Lonning et al 2005 ).

Post hoc analysis showed that there was only a slightly significant increase in EU2 viral load between titers ( Fig 3C ; low titer: VL EU2 = 594.1 ± 416 GE/ml vs high titer: VL EU2 =: 7.08x10 3 ± 5.26x10 3 , p -value = 0.02).

However, Egger’s regression test revealed there is slightly significant publication bias in the dominant model ( p = 0.02), but not in the other models (allele model: p = 0.18, homozygote model: p = 0.57, heterozygote model: p = 0.10, recessive model: p = 0.71).

There is a slightly significant difference for PC1 between infants and juveniles ( P = 0.02), adolescents ( P = 0.06), and early adults ( P = 0.03), but these differences are no longer significant after Bonferroni correction.

The mothers of the embryos are mostly of European origin (87%) and their median age at the date of collection was 36.7 ± 5.9 years, with slightly significant higher age in recurrent cases compared to first ones (Fig. 1 , Mann–Whitney p-value = 0.02).

Overall, slightly significant associations were found in allelic genetic model (OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.01∼1.12, p = 0.02), additive genetic model (OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.02∼1.21, p = 0.02) for Arg/Gly16.

By contrast, the drying temperature had a slightly significant effect, showing significant differences only at the highest HPMC concentration ( p = 0.02).

The HU of the NELM exhibited a slightly significant decrease in non-responder (p = 0.02), while no significant change was observed in responding lesions.

In this study, there was slightly significant difference of TBF of the tumoural region differentiating grade II from grade III gliomas ( p = 0.02), while the peritumoural region TBF measures revealed a highly significant difference between both groups ( p = 0.001).

Alteration of anti-inflammatory cytokines Of the anti-inflammatory cytokines, IL-10 in the serum of LDC patients revealed a somewhat similar slightly significant pattern in LDC ( P = 0.0209) and in LDR cases ( P = 0.0309) compared with HC and LDC, respectively, as shown in Figure 3k .

At the same time, an RV echocardiography performed at 6 months revealed slightly significant reduction in TRV ( p = 0.021) and estimated PASP ( p = 0.022) but not in tricuspid regurgitation ( p = 0.166).

One haplotype showed a slightly significant excess transmission ( P = 0.021) in Xhosa SZ population but this finding was not observed in Sardinian and Palestinian BD populations ( P = 0.441 and P = 0.690, respectively).

ΔGPEET produced salivary gland infections in fewer flies (10.7% infection, TI = 20.5%); the difference to the wild type was slightly significant statistically (p = 0.021).

Although slightly significant differences between the percentage of carbohydrate ( p = 0.0214) and protein ( p = 0.0054) intake were observed between trials, no significant difference was observed for the actual energy intake.

Also, the difference between males and females in these ages groups was found to be slightly significant ( P = 0.022).

However, despite no macroscopic frontal and/or temporal atrophy on MRI being determined by neuroradiologist, the four cases of possible bvFTD displayed a slightly significant cortical thinning compared with controls (p=0.022 on Student’s t-test).

Moreover, all injured animals showed a worsening in motor performance in the open field test, although only the decrease in active behavior was slightly significant compared to control rats (one way ANOVA, p = 0.022∗).

Interestingly, a slightly significant relationship between the PE and the AL was found in the Kane formula ( β = – 0.099, P = 0.023), but the regression equation showed no significance ( P = 0.059).

These significantly lower values were associated with slightly significant higher absolute lymphocyte counts (Median: 2.03, IQR: 1.65–2.35, P = 0.023).

Exo-miR-17-5p alone showed a slightly significant positive association with DFS by microarray data (HR = 1.253, p -value = 0.023, n = 67) but it was not associated with DFS by ddPCR data (HR = 1.028, p -value = 0.623, n = 63); however, when combined in a multivariable model, the HR of Exo-miR-17-5p became lower than “one” (i.e., negatively associated with DFS) and significant, underlying an interaction with miR-130a-3p that seems to balance its positive contribution to the final predictive score.

Figure 2 A shows a slightly significant difference in the accessory genome size in favor of C. hyointestinalis subsp. hyointestinalis (p = 0.023, Mann–Whitney U test).

In this case, we got only a slightly significant difference (*, P = 0.02318) compared with standard one‐way ANOVA (***, P < 2.2e−16) and nonsignificant pairwise comparison (EMMs) with the highest difference being between treatments with 0.1 μM IAA vs DMSO.

A slightly significant association of RAS mutation status with male gender was noted (p=0.024).