Barely Significant
← all phrases

slightly significant

1,757 sentences · 1,757 papers · 2,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.06p=0.09

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

More than half of the indexes in the literature on SRs showed that when p > 0.10, 0% ≤ I 2 < 50%, the homogeneity indicates no heterogeneity, and the score is 3 points; 0.10 ≥ p ≥ 0.05, 50% ≤ I 2 ≤ 75% is regarded as slightly significant heterogeneity with a score of 2 points, and 0.05 > p , I 2 > 75% is considered significant heterogeneity with a score 1 point. 24 If the publication bias is ignored, the risk of publication bias would be high. 25 The scoring system was as> follows: in each project, the worst study gets a minimum score of 1 point, the second-to-last study gets 2 points, and so on.
Adjusted odds ratios per 100 ppb increase in indoor TVOCs were slightly significant for upper respiratory syndrome (OR = 1.06; 95% CI = 1.04–1.07), stuffy nose (OR = 1.01; 95% CI = 1.01–1.02), dry throat (OR = 1.06; 95% CI = 1.03–1.09) and lower respiratory syndrome (OR = 1.01; 95% CI = 1.00–1.01), non-specific syndrome (OR = 1.03; 95% CI = 1.02–1.05), tiredness (OR = 1.02; 95% CI = 1.01–1.04), angry easily (OR = 1.02; 95% CI = 1.01–1.04) and dizziness (OR = 1.01; 95% CI = 1.00–1.02).
Why Shannon Diversity Was Not Different between NAT and Tumor Tissues In this study, Shannon diversity or richness of microbial taxa was not found to be significantly different between NAT and tumor tissues; however, microbial evenness defined by Simpson’s index was slightly significant between the two groups.
Even if the same method of quantification is used, being that by UV–VIS spectroscopy or bioassay, within the method, there can exist slightly significant differences such as wavelength, reaction conditions, bacterial strains or microbiological determination methods, etc., making it difficult to find the relevance in comparing two values obtained by different means.
In a study conducted in Jordan among hospitalised patients with CKD, the majority of DRPs (62%) were classified among the significant category; however, the study used a different scale (extremely significant, much significant, significant and slightly significant). 25 In a study conducted in Canada, approximately half of the observed DRPs were moderate in severity in terms of causing harm to patients with CKD. 26 The different scales used in severity assessment across the literature make the comparison seem challenging.
Small differences in the intensity of the peak at 1160 cm −1 related to the C-O-C stretching in cellulose and hemicellulose were observed, while a slightly significant decrease of the peak at 1035 cm −1 was detected indicating the C-O stretching of cellulose in both CC3 treated BPS-G101 and G109.