Barely Significant
← all phrases

trending towards significance

114 sentences · 114 papers · 646 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>0.15

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

trending towards significancep = 0.061.2× alphagold
c-tDCS group showed comparatively lower improvements than the s-tDCS group in accuracy interference reduction after the intervention trending towards significance (Fig. 6 a), Brunner-Munzel t (41.83) = −1.93, p = 0.06, δ = 0.32 (medium).
trending towards significancep = 0.06141.2× alphagold
There was no significant effect of context on total number of lever presses [RM two-way ANOVA: F (1,8) = 3.051, p = 0.1188] and on response rate [RM two-way ANOVA: F (1,8) = 0.2291, p = 0.6450] but the effect was trending towards significance for reward rate [RM two-way ANOVA: F (1,8) = 4.729, p = 0.0614] during the scheduled reinforcement phase in WT mice.
trending towards significancep=0.071.4× alphagold
We found that treatment with PEDD of nelitolimod as monotherapy reduced MDSCs within TME (trending towards significance mean % of MDSCs±SEM—nelitolimod 15.7±2.8 vs Veh 25.9±4.5; p=0.07) compared with Veh, further significantly augmented by Sys or SQ α-PD-1 ( figure 2A , mean % of MDSCs±SEM – SQ/Sys – 8.3±1.4/10.9±2.4 vs Veh 25.9±4.5; p<0.01).
trending towards significanceP = 0.071.4× alphagold
In contrast, there were significant correlations between histological abnormalities in the large intestine and reduced infant macaque growth kinetics including the cecum ( P = 0.02), ascending colon ( P = 0.02), transverse colon ( P = 0.03), descending colon ( P = 0.07; trending towards significance), rectum ( P = 0.004), and the large intestine in total ( P = 0.01) 20 .
trending towards significanceP = 0.07141.4× alphagold
If we limit our analysis to neurons that satisfy these stringent criteria for putative single neurons, we still find a significant number of ESNs in the first experiment (95 out of 373 single neurons; P < 0.001) and a number of ESNs trending towards significance in the second experiment (21 out of 132 single neurons; P = 0.0714).
trending towards significancep = 0.081.6× alphagold
For the trained leg, there was an increase of around 15% from M1 to M2 for the FE group (β = 1.32 (0.72)), but the change over time in comparison to the control group was only trending towards significance (t(50) = 1.81, p = 0.08) and only became significant at M3 (β = 1.80 (0.72)) (t(50) = 2.49, p = 0.02).