Although p = 0.05, the correlation between the BBS and the total hip T-score is very close to statistical significance (r = 0.949, p = 0.05). 4.
← all phrases
“very close to statistical significance”
In the literature
Two other criteria showed compliance improvements very close to statistical significance ( p = 0.05), i.e., the request for hemorrhage panels from the clinical laboratory, including fibrinogen measures, and the administration of blood derivatives to achieve an FFP:pRBC ratio ≥ 1:2.
Having one or more comorbidities had a borderline value very close to statistical significance with OR 1.59 (1.00–2.55, p = .050).
For the lowest LipoDex dose, a trend toward improved vessel maturation was noted, which was very close to statistical significance ( p = 0.051 vs. control).
In particular, core-specific and envelope (env)-specific CD4 T cell responses showed a significant inverse correlation with baseline HBcrAg values (core p=0.024; env p=0.034), whereas among CD8 T cells, a correlation was detected for the overall CD8 T cell population (p=0.048; figure 5E , left panels), with a trend very close to statistical significance for env-specific CD8 T cell responses (p=0.051, figure 5E ).
Item 17, I feel lonely even when I am with other people , was very close to statistical significance, improving at all three follow‐ups ( p = 0.052).
Regarding the number of granulocytes, in AD it was much lower than in HCs, and the result was very close to statistical significance (U = 418; p = 0.053; p (BH) = 0.053; r G = −0.23).
Moreover, a non-significant but very close to statistical significance ( p = 0.053) difference was noted for the TAG concentration change from w0 to w9.
This relationship is very close to statistical significance ( p = 0.055).
This difference came very close to statistical significance ( p = 0.056).
In our study, all of the patients who underwent PPMI were patients with type 1 L-R fusion and this result was very close to statistical significance ( p = 0.06).
The difference was very close to statistical significance ( p = 0.061).
very close to statistical significancep = 0.0662
The difference between the two groups (placebo and probiotic) for this parameter did not meet the threshold of significant but was still very close to statistical significance ( p = 0.0662).
The authors published that the concentration of ΣDEHP was positively associated with early menarche, and this result was very close to statistical significance ( p = 0.069) [ 21 ].
The observed association was consistent with H2 and very close to statistical significance: b = −0.19 [−0.40,0.02], t = 1.78, p = 0.077.
There was no significant difference in expression of DAZL as measured by qRT-PCR ( p = 0.463), whereas the result was very close to statistical significance for OCT-4 ( p = 0.082) and significant for NANOG ( p = 0.046) ( Figure 2 ).
very close to statistical significancep = 0.560153
The results show that while the p-value of the t-test does not reach 0.05 for any of the measurements, for the Speaking Time Standard Deviation (STSD), its value is very close to statistical significance ( p = 0.560153).
In this context, when stratifying the studies according to the surgical technique, it is observed that, in the case of SG, patients with MASH experienced a lower degree of weight loss very close to statistical significance, compared to those without MASH.
Partial DQ coordination was reduced in infants of mothers with postpartum depression, with a result very close to statistical significance.
From 2018 to 2021, a new increase in the total population was observed, especially due to the increase in females, which was very close to statistical significance [SMR = 2.00 (0.79–4.28)] ( Figure 3 ). 3.3.4.
Furthermore, from week 4 onwards, weekly differences very close to statistical significance were observed between the two treatment groups; the statistical significance was obtained at week 6 (result with *) with a clear reduction in pain in the group that received IF with respect to the group placebo ( Table 3 ).
The other comparisons did not produce significant results, although the comparison of scores for the 235‐3M1 combination is worth highlighting, where differences came very close to statistical significance.
In the case of the active range of motion of the affected upper extremity in the frontal plane evaluated with the Armeo system ® , the p -value was very close to statistical significance.
In the case of trabecular bone at the interradicular level (ROI 5), the data obtained were very close to statistical significance, with a high effect size, indicating a strong suggestion of a relationship.
This reference is very close to statistical significance.