“weakly significant”

This revealed 3 genes that were highly significant differentially expressed (p > 0.001), 2 genes significant differentially expressed (p > 0.01) and 5 genes weakly significant differentially expressed (p > 0.05) ( Table 2 ) after multiple testing correction.

p -values were considered weakly significant if p < 0.05 (*), significant if p < 0.01 (**), and highly significant if p < 0.001 (***).

The association of family income with BMI is weakly significant [[ χ 2 (8; N=1916) 24.672, P = 0.002] ( Table 4 ).

Albeit weakly significant but opposing differences for k = 3 (two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test; P = 0.003) and k = 4 ( P = 0.004), we did not find any support for the hypothesis that either the master regulator or the intermediate regulator in a FFL is generally more important.

This effect was weakly significant when tested by the Mann–Whitney U test ( p = 0.0032) in which sessions from all animals in each task were grouped together, as is often done in systems neuroscience.

Using this approach, GEE with ICP as the independent variable weighted for distance of measurement and ONHV or ONHH as the dependent variable were weakly significant for ONHV (B = 0.020, SE = 0.007, p = 0.004) and interestingly significant for ONHH with a negative association (B = −0.003, SE = 0.0005, p<0.001), meaning that IIH patients with a high ICP showed a more depressed ONHH.

A weakly significant positive relationship was found between NLR and WBC/MPV ( r = 0.264 p = 0.004) (shown in Table 4 ).

The results showed a weakly significant negative correlation between PIP concentration and total protein amount in tear samples from dry eye patients ( n = 115; r = −0.261, p = 0.005).

In GAM_02, which included a temporal variable “year” in addition to the environmental predictors, humidity, vegetation index and the temporal predictor were statistically significant predictors ( P <.005), while the effect of wind speed was weakly significant in this model ( P >.005).

This correlation was found to be highly significant for a strong positive or negative bias ( p ++ = 0.0045, p - - = 0.0057), and only close to or weakly significant for a weak positive or negative bias ( p + = 0.0762, p - = 0.0384).

However, we found no strong correlations between phase durations, with the possible exception of the daughters’ G1 and G2, which showed a weakly significant correlation ( R 2 = 0.063, P = 0.006; Fig 3 L, Appendix Fig S8Q ).

ABO C-R Eval scores showed a weakly significant association with treatment duration ( r = 0.162; p =0.006), while CCA scores were moderately associated with treatment duration ( r = 0.451; p < 0.001).

Moreover, a weakly significant correlation was found between PRA and PAC in the APSCs group ( r s = .51; P = .006; n = 27).

The ASD MCS showed a weakly significant cross-disorder prediction in the SCZ test cohort (cohort 7, P = 6.36 × 10 −3 , AUC = 0.59), but no significance was observed for prediction of the SCZ MCS into the ASD cohorts.

Among the biomarkers evaluated, only pre-PCI neopterin level showed a weakly significant correlation with the absolute volume of the necrotic core (r=0.320, p =0.008).

There was an apparent reduction in the batch effect after applying ComBat, although differences between batches remained weakly significant (PERMANOVA p = 0.008, Fig 2 ) [ 8 ].

The differences in translation inhibition from that observed in Huh 7.5 cells were weakly significant (HeLa P = 0.0084 and Vero P = 0.0110).

Statistical significance of probes was determined using Student's T-test ( http://www.physics.csbsju.edu/stats/t-test.html ) with p-values: p>0.05 (not significant, n.s.); p<0.05 (weakly significant; *); p<0.01 (significant; **); p<0.001 (highly significant; ***).

Values were considered statistically significant when P <0.05 (weakly significant), P <0.01 (medium-strength significance) and P <0.001 (strongly significant).

Statistical evaluation Statistical significance of probes was determined according to Student's T-test ( http://www.physics.csbsju.edu/stats/t-test.html ) and p-value was scaled accordingly: p>0.05 (not significant, n.s.); p<0.05 (weakly significant; *); p<0.01 (significant; **); p<0.001 (highly significant; ***).

Statistical significance of probes was determined according to Student's T-test ( http://www.physics.csbsju.edu/stats/t-test.html ) and p-value was scaled accordingly: p>0.05 (not significant, n.s.); p<0.05 (weakly significant; *); p<0.01 (significant; **); p<0.001 (highly significant; ***).

Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient showed a strongly significant negative correlation between C-reactive protein and the AGR (ρ = − 0.71, P < 0.01), as well as a weakly significant negative correlation between the NLR and the AGR (ρ = − 0.41, P < 0.01) and a weakly significant positive correlation between hemoglobin and the AGR (ρ = + 0.46, P < 0.01).

Overall, we found a weakly significant association between familial immune-mediated conditions and NDDs in children from MS mothers ( r = 0.13; p = 0.01) and a significant relationship between NDD family history and NDD diagnosis in off spring at the 95% CI ( r = 0.75; p = 0.005; Figure 2 ).

The hyperpallium on its own had no significant positive correlation at all ( p > .1) and one weakly significant negative correlation ( r 2 = .48, p = .01; meaning absence of this subnetwork; Figure 8(a) ), indicating that the hyperpallium could not be distinguished from the nidopallium in terms of gene functional networks in this analysis.

While species in shallow-water assemblages 1N are moving west-southwest (Figs 3B and 4B ), possibly tracking cooler bottom temperatures in the southwestern Gulf of Maine ( S5 Fig ), overall there is no significant relationship in terms of latitudinal climate velocities in the fall ( Fig 6C ; r 2 = -0.05, p > 0.05), and only a weakly significant relationship in the spring ( Fig 7C ; r 2 = 0.34, p < 0.01).