Barely Significant
← all phrases

weakly significant

243 sentences · 243 papers · 1,784 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.11

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

weakly significantP >.0050.1× alphaqualifiedgold
In GAM_02, which included a temporal variable “year” in addition to the environmental predictors, humidity, vegetation index and the temporal predictor were statistically significant predictors ( P <.005), while the effect of wind speed was weakly significant in this model ( P >.005).
weakly significantP <.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
It was found that there was a mostly positive but weakly significant relationship between digital game addiction and children’s eating behaviors ( P <.01; P <.05) and a highly significant relationship was found between the sleep disorder scale sleep hyperhidrosis sub-dimension ( P <.05).
weakly significantp = 0.0250.5× alphaqualifiedgold
However, the weakly significant rain × exposure × season length and exposure × season length × treatment interactions in the full model (both p = 0.025, Table A1 ) indicated that exposures differed with season length in certain cases that we will detail below by the split models.
weakly significantp = 3 × 10 −20.6× alphaqualifiedgold
Using the same approach, we analysed the effects of day and night (i.e., circadian rhythm) and found a discrete, but consistent difference with significantly higher values at nighttime in the cages with the males ( p = 7.4 × 10 −16 ); in the cages with the females this covariation was smaller and only weakly significant ( p = 3 × 10 −2 ) (see Supporting Materials, Figure S3 ).
weakly significantp = 0.0300.6× alphaqualifiedgold
In Table 6 , the odds of utilizing the before (discharging) postnatal care among rural women with primary education are still low, but the level of significance changed from being weakly significant (or = 0.06[CI = 0.38,0.95]p = 0.030) to being not statistically significant (or = 0.82[CI = 0.59,1.12]p>.05).
weakly significantP = 0.030.6× alphaqualifiedgold
The relative odds of bug infection stratified by intervention period was 5.5-fold (95% CI: 4.28–7.06) greater when a domestic infestation was detected rather than when it was not (MH χ 2 = 224.8, df = 1, P < 0.001), with weakly significant heterogeneity between periods (homogeneity χ 2 = 7.3, df = 1, P = 0.03).