Compared with the non-smoking group, the combined (HNB and cigarette smokers) group showed lower Lac secretion rate (3.2 (1.0–9.3) μg/min), but the difference was weakly significant ( p < 0.05) ( Figure 2 b). 3.4.
← all phrases
“weakly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.11
In the literature
On the one hand, there is weakly significant (0.1 < p < 0.05) evidence that the “satisfaction treadmill” is at work for income expectations, as there is a positive correlation between higher life satisfaction expectations and surpassing their income expectations, but not vice-versa (without controls: β 1 2 = 0.013, p > 0.1 and β 2 2 = 0.206, 0.1 < p < 0.05; with controls: β 1 2 = 0.024, p > 0.1 and β 2 2 = 0.197, 0.1 < p < 0.05).
In linear models, wrist circumference was a weakly significant predictor of clinically-confirmed bone deformity after age and sex adjustment (deformity versus normal phenotype: wrist circumference = 3.0 SE 1.5 mm p = 0.05) wrist width was not (0.7 mm SE 0.5 mm p = 0.2) Discussion Rickets is a major public health problem, especially in developing countries and in some ethnic groups living in more affluent countries [2] .
Pearson correlation analyses showed that soil salt, EC, and BD had a weakly significant negative correlation with Shannon diversity ( p < 0.05).
ANOSIM demonstrated that the catch data were not significantly different ( P > 0.05) between day and night in fishing zones 6, 7 and 8, but was weakly significant in fishing zone 2 ( P < 0.05; R = 0.266).
For the shorter incubation (8 h), the addition of the XF prior to 3-NP ( Figure 3 A, white bars) for the first 4 h resulted in statistically insignificant or weakly significant ( p > 0.05) increase of cell survival in comparison to the 3-NP treated cells with no clear relationship to the applied XF concentration.
In the most downstream part of the estuary, 0–50 km, annual average concentrations show a weakly significant increase, at a rate of 0.5 mg L −1 yr −1 (p < 0.05, R 2 = 0.21) (Fig. 2F ).
There was also a weakly significant interaction of the factors antibody, sex and day (F 2,40 = 4.98, p < 0.05).
In this study, we observed a weakly significant (p<0.05) decrease in EF with conventional echocardiography in the patient group compared to the controls.
Due to the high variability of ear length in juveniles, the decrease in the 2020s was pronounced but not significant in males (F 4,360 = 0.94, p = 0.44) and weakly significant in females (F 4,472 = 2.5, p < 0.05).
There was only a small difference between Neanderthals and chimpanzees in the genes they had in each of the three networks; the difference was weakly significant for each of the networks if the samples are considered correlated ( Tukey’s HSD test , p < 0.05) and insignificant for the emotional reactivity network if the samples are independent (Table 2 , Supplementary Table S8 ).
The association of gender with profiles’ membership was also weakly significant, χ 2 (2, N = 503) = 6.47, p < .05, [Cramer’s V = 0.11], with more females in the Severe Psy/Low QoL profile (43%), whereas more males were observed in the PTSD-dominant/Preserved QoL profile (36%).
This difference is weakly significant and consistent with a house-money effect (Rank-sum and t , p > 0.05, n = 117).
The effect for age was only weakly significant (F (1, 2679) = 5.50, p <.05, η2 = .002), while the effect for the SES proxy was not significant (F (1, 2679) = .42, ns, η2 = .000).
The correlations between Q4 and Q5 and Q4 and Q6 were very low and not significant ( r (53) = .02, p > .05; r (53) = .04, p > .05), but the correlation between Q5 and Q6 was low and weakly significant ( r (53) = .32, p < .05), showing that those with an accent bias were slightly more likely to consider accent to be an important aspect of English learning.
For the lag at the upper end of our expectation, i.e., a lag of nine years, the autocorrelation is weakly significant (p = .051), see Table 1 .
We found a significant break in the trend of DEA estimates between 2014 and 2015 (specifically at 2014·8; p<0·0001, adjusted R 2 =0·0054) and a weakly significant increasing trend between 2015 and 2019 (0·86% increase; p=0·051).
However, using the constant B estimates ( S4 Table ), weakly significant relationships were found for the difference between Commelinids and other species (Wilcoxon test: p-value = 0.0519) and the correlation between B and GC3 (ρ Spearman = 0.691, p-value = 0.023).
In addition, compared to the number of visits among normal weight individuals, the number of visits among obese individuals was higher and statistically significant for five measures [all OP visits ( p < 0.031); and all OBD visits, OBD physician visits, ER visits, and inpatient stays each had p < 0.001] and the number of visits among overweight individuals was higher and statistically significant for ER visits ( p < 0.002), and weakly significant for inpatient stays ( p < 0.052).
We found a weakly significant correlation between the side of the brain where the old lesion occurred and DHI ( p =0.052) ( Table 3 ).
For the DOA observers (see Table 3 ), the L-cone plateau showed weakly significant age-related decreases (Pearson's r = −0.596, P = 0.053), and the Ferry-Porter slope weakly significant increases ( r = 0.613, P = 0.045 for the Ferry-Porter slope).
After adjustment, however, there were no significant associations, although most of the regression coefficients remained positive, and the relationship with scientific understanding was weakly significant ( P = 0.054).
Participation in religious activities was a protective predictor against smoking cannabis though weakly significant (OR = 0.76, p = 0.054).
Vaccinated cats had decreased odds (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.0) of having lymphoma compared to unvaccinated cats, however this was significant in the fixed effect model (P = 0.043) and only weakly significant in the mixed effect model (P = 0.054), once clustering at a clinic level was adjusted for (Table 4 ).
The difference, however, is only weakly significant in statistical terms ( p = 0.056) Decomposition of SSS-related inequalities in depressive symptoms Results from the decomposition by gender are shown in Table 2 .