“weakly significant”

We discovered a weakly significant connection between MFAP2 expression and tumor purity (r = 0.075, P < 0.05).

Differences observed among the four groups regarding periodontal disease based on the presence of pockets were weakly significant (p = 0.05).

The correlations between Q4 and Q5 and Q4 and Q6 were very low and not significant ( r (53) = .02, p > .05; r (53) = .04, p > .05), but the correlation between Q5 and Q6 was low and weakly significant ( r (53) = .32, p < .05), showing that those with an accent bias were slightly more likely to consider accent to be an important aspect of English learning.

Additionally, it was observed that the tail was raised weakly significantly ( p < 0.05) more frequently in hours two to one than in hours four to three of the observation period.

There was a weakly significant interaction between time and MPSS ( p = 0.05) ( Table 4 ).

Despite some weakly significant indifferences, anti-N IgM indicated no increase over the naïve negative (NEG) population (n = 64; p < 0.05; IgM median MFI: Nucleoprotein SS:183, AA:135, SA:134, NEG:184) as was the case for IgA ( p > 0.05; IgA median MFI: Nucleoprotein SS:53, AA:40, SA:46, NEG:48).

The first two axes (both weakly significant, p < 0.05, ANOVA by axis) explain only 5.4% of the fitted model, with temperature significantly influencing the larvae assemblage ( p < 0.01, ANOVA by term).

For example, there were weakly significant differences (0.01 < p < 0.05) by diagnosis in network connectivity correlations in group 1 (4 of 279), group 2 (12 of 1077), group 3 (3 of 366), group 4 (0 of 627) and group 5 (1 of 209).

The lower level of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) following postpartum ketosis in primiparous cows was weakly significant ( Table 6 , p = 0.050).

The SEM diagrams represent aggregate responses of complex bacterial systems to abiotic drivers, and as such, it is not surprising that many of these links were relatively weak or weakly significant ( p < 0.05).

P -values were considered weakly significant if 0.1 ≥ P > 0.05 and statistically significant if P ≤ 0.05.

There was also a weakly significant interaction of the factors antibody, sex and day (F 2,40 = 4.98, p < 0.05).

In countries with higher trust, stricter containment measures were positively associated with birth rates, both for conceptions in the first year of the pandemic ( P = 0.019) and, albeit only weakly significant, for conceptions later in the pandemic ( P = 0.057).

Despite only weakly significant, the number of seeds in scats increased with canopy cover in sacred grove (R 2 = 0.63, F 1,4 = 6.8, p = 0.06), but decreased with canopy cover in coffee plantation (R 2 = 0.33, F 1,8 = 3.9, p = 0.08).

Despite the MSOM showing weakly significant pairwise co-occurrence ( α = 2.12 ± 1.11 SE , z = 1.90, P = 0.06; Table 3 ) between snow leopard and red fox, the results obtained from the predicted conditional occupancy of each species, based on the presence/absence of the interacting species, showed that the presence/absence of the red fox (i.e., first and second scenarios) did not affect the probability of occupancy of the snow leopard (red fox present: β = 0.47 ± 0.34 SE , CI95% = 1.74e−03 – 0.99; red fox absent: β = 0.46 ± 0.34 SE , CI95% = 2.78e−05 – 0.99) ( Supplementary Material 3 ).

Caregiver marital status was correlated with higher adherence, though this was only weakly significant ( p = 0.061).

4 , the addition of NSE to the model1 improved risk prediction of 1-year AIS outcomes, leading to a weakly significant increase in C-statistics but significant improvement in reclassification (Δ AUC = 0.049, p = 0.066; NRI = 39.45%, p = 0.028; IDI = 5.47%, p = 0.126).

In the fully interacted model, which is not included here due to lack of space, only the interaction term Enablement × Unequal Productivity is weakly significant ( p = 0.079) and positive.

Indeed, the analogous 39‐season correlation between anomalous monthly January d SHF d y ∼ 50 km at this location and the monthly January NAO index is negligible, but weakly significant 1 month later for the February NAO ( r = −0.28, p = 0.08).

The mean change was not significant from t 0 to t 1 (SMD = 0.108; CI [−0.163; 0.378]; p = 0.435), weakly significant in the comparison between the baseline and t 2 (SMD = 0.335; CI [−0.052; 0.723]; p = 0.089), and again not significant t 1 to t 2 (SMD = 0.025; CI [−0.365; 0.416]; p = 0.898).

Children of mothers with higher educational attainment had about 93% higher odds of being vaccinated compared to those whose mothers had no formal education; however, the result was weakly significant at 10% level (AOR = 1.93, 95%CI = 0.90 to 4.13, p = 0.09).

For models with at least a weakly significant marginal effect (i.e., p < 0.1), we then assessed the significance of the odds ratio for each pair of levels of each predictor by Wald tests and Wald confidence intervals.

However, individuals, who had only mental disabilities, experienced about 1.3 months shorter employment, while physical disabilities resulted in positive, yet merely weakly significant findings (p < 0.1).

Under the influence of sports participation, social equity was a strong contributor to economic status ( p < 0.05) and affective attributions ( p < 0.001), with no significant effect on class identity; school level was a significant contributor to economic status ( p < 0.05), with no significant effect on class identity and affective attributions; and education level was a weakly significant contributor to affective attributions ( p < 0.1), with no significant effect on class identity and economic status.

The two cases with negative aggregate impacts (AVC trainings plus promotions arm, which had minimal gender content (weakly significant at p < 0.10), and JP RWEE beneficiaries who lost credit access) underscore the importance of conscious strategies and project sustainability, even to ensure that projects “do no harm” to women's empowerment.