Barely Significant

Excerpts

4,234 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
There was a significant negative correlation between Bacillus and ethyl hexanoate ( p < 0.05), Pichia showed a significant negative correlation with ethyl isobutyrate ( p < 0.05), Candida showed a highly significant negative correlation with ethyl butyrate ( p < 0.01), and Rhodosporidium was significantly positively correlated with ethyl butyrate ( p < 0.05).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
For Salmonella challenged with CPC and then neutralized, the interaction of sanitizer concentration and neutralizers concentration was highly significant ( p < 0.01) for predicting Salmonella growth or non-growth; counts of Salmonella inocula did not function as a co-variate to influence growth/no growth results ( Table 1 ).
extremely significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
The use of different letters such as “a” and “b” indicates significant differences at the p < 0.05 level; “**” indicates extremely significant difference at the p < 0.01 level, “*” indicates significant difference at the p < 0.05 level, and “ns” indicates no significant difference between the two groups. 3.
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Based on the trend of gel properties with changes in α-helix and β-sheet content, as shown in Figure 9 , there was a significant positive correlation ( p < 0.05) between α-helix, β-sheet, and elasticity, viscosity, Final G′′, Final G’, and a highly significant positive correlation ( p < 0.01) between α-helix, β-sheet, and WHC, hardness, and chewiness.
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
An additional correlation analysis ( Table 3 ) resulted in highly significant ( p < 0.01) correlation coefficients that ranged between 0.71 (between Fe nutritional yield and Cu nutritional yield) and 0.95 (between yield and Mg nutritional yield) for the five variables studied (yield; and Fe, Zn, Cu, and Mg nutritional yield). 3.3.