Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,862 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginal significancep = 0.061.2× alphagold
Associations between NR3C1 DNA methylation and peritraumatic distress, perceived stress, and depression Results in the lower panel of Table 2 show that pregnant women who were depressed had a higher NR3C1 DNA methylation level than women who were not depressed with a marginal significance level (t = −2.13, p = 0.06).
borderline significancep = 0.0601.2× alpha
The results showed that high expression of ALOX15 was significantly positively associated with larger tumor size (p = 0.013) and vascular invasion (p = 0.043) and correlated with advanced tumor stage with borderline significance (p = 0.060) ( Table 1 ), suggesting that ALOX15 is related to the malignant behavior of BC.
marginally significantP = 0.061.2× alphagold
Validation in SLE, RA, IBD, and JIA By comparing the TPM values of CD160 and CD58 from four RNA-seq datasets including SLE ( GSE112087 ), RA ( GSE117769 ), IBD (GSE112057IBD), and JIA (GSE112057JIA), we found that the aberrant expression of CD160 was statistically significant in SLE ( P = 0.0006), IBD ( P < 0.0001) and JIA ( P = 0.0005), and was marginally significant in RA ( P = 0.06) ( Figure 3 ).
borderline significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Similarly, in the subgroup of patients with moderate atopic dermatitis defined as baseline IGA = 3, the Nu0.5 group showed a borderline significant decrease in IGA score from baseline (-16.7%, 95% CI: -31.3% to -2.0%, p = 0.06) ( Figure 2F ).
a strong trendp = 0.0601.2× alphagold
Although the confidence intervals for both treatments included 1, cadonilimab had a strong trend toward benefit in PFS (HR = 0.65, 95%CI = 0.42–1.03), where the upper limit approached significance ( p = 0.060) compared with pembrolizumab, which did not show a clear benefit in this subgroup (HR ~ 1).
nearly reached significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
Lastly, in the differential between ANA- SLE and AHV ( Figure 2F ), TC4d (AUC: 0.75) significantly outperformed anti-Smith (0.42, p < 0.01) and nearly reached significance for superior performance against anti-dsDNA (0.51, p = 0.06) and C3 (0.50, p = 0.05).