Excerpts

The results showed a marginally significant effect of IMC performance, M PASSED_IMC = 1.58 vs.

A clear trend is that children with ASD show finiteness performance below their chronological age level, just like children with SLI.

Sinharay and Haberman (2014) studied practical significance of model misfit with various empirical data sets and concluded that the misfit was not always practically significant though evidence of misfit for a substantial number of items was demonstrated.

While confirming automatic thoughts as a predictor of depression following the family maltreatment, it is fairly significant to alter migrant children's cognition of interpreting their experience as well as reducing their exposure to maltreatment, particular for the vulnerable migrant children with ODD symptoms.

However, there was a statistical trend in the Condition × Trial Type interaction with the BO-Condition showing a somewhat larger difference between regular and deviant trials than the RO-Condition, particularly in the last three training blocks.

This effect could not be attributed to specific differences between single blocks by post-hoc tests, though there seemed to be a numerical trend for participants making slightly more errors in the middle of the experiment (lowest mean error rate: Block 1 = 5.7%, highest mean error rate: Block 3 = 7.7%, Block 6 = 6.8%).

Additionally, the analysis of a genetic overlap between pathological gambling and alcohol dependence revealed, by polygenic risk score analysis of the alcohol dependence dataset, a one-sided nominally significant P -value in individuals with pathological gambling.

In addition, all main effects were more pronounced in old participants: they had stronger performance decrements in cognitive dual tasks compared to single tasks [difference between dual tasks and single tasks: old: M = 0.33; SE = 0.05; young: M = 0.09; SE = 0.02; difference between age groups: t (19) = 4.01, p < 0.001, d = 1.75], for modality incompatible compared to modality compatible tasks [difference between modality incompatible and modality compatible tasks; old: M = 0.21; SE = 0.02; young: M = 0.05; SE = 0.02; difference between age groups: t (19) = 4.93, p < 0.001, d = 2.15] and marginally significant higher decrements during standing compared to sitting [difference between standing and sitting: old: M = 0.07; SE = 0.02; young: M = 0.03; SE = 0.02; difference between age groups: t (19) = 1.87, p = 0.077, d = 0.82].

Because by simply differentiating identical and non-identical clips with a binary variable, one can readily obtain highly significant fits with the similarity data.

However, this difference was only marginally significant (Rank Test: t = 5.254, df = 1, p = 0.0219 < 0.10 1/3 = 0.034).

In experimental research, variance explained is often small (under 10%) even though the p- value may be significant.

The Multiplicity Scale (Carter, 2008 ) incorporates many items that refer to dissociation, and one study using this instrument found that the level of personality integrity was associated only with neuroticism ( r = 0.35, marginally significant) among the Big Five factors in a sample of undergraduate students ( N = 67; Lester and Carter, 2013 ), which is in line with other studies that have found an association between dissociation and neuroticism ( r = 0.27; Ruiz et al., 1999 ).

The opposite was true, when stigmatized identities were visible, although this relationship was weaker and only marginally significant.

At the same time, the regression correlations between brain activation in these regions (except ACC) and the initial craving scores were significant or marginally significant.

As can be seen in Table 2 , Model 1 was highly significant and explained 68% of the variance in preterm children’s math scores.

However, this feature was only marginally significant.

Although the indirect effect was only marginally significant, this result suggests that self-verification can at least in part explain the delayed update of the prediction outcome of negative self-reference in individuals with depressive symptoms.

That is, the breadth of the P-Lattice representation in the brain may be significant.

Moreover, the relationships among basic values, career orientations, and career anchors were highly significant in the direction of the two bipolar dimensions and motivational continuum proposed in Schwartz' structural values model.

Treated participants also showed a trend-level depressive symptom reduction, but no changes on other well-being measures.

For example, a trait × state interaction for the SC-IAT fell short of significance, which descriptively pointed toward increased positive implicit attitudes toward chocolate after deprivation in high trait chocolate cravers.

All effects revealing a significance level of p < 0.05, and p < 0.1 for marginal significance are reported.

Perceptual narrowing is a highly significant development associated with the first year of life.

Interestingly, compared to the contralateral condition, the SSVEP amplitude elicited by the 20 Hz flicker stimulus presented ipsilateral to the cue showed a trend of early enhancement and subsequent inhibition; however, this trend was not significant in the 801~1,400 ms period.

As such, a single work event may be experienced as extremely significant, or meaningful, by one worker and as not significant at all, or not meaningful, by another worker ( Rosso et al., 2010 ).