Excerpts

Comparing the 7–13 condition with the random condition revealed a marginally significant effect of training level for target position 7, F (2,75) = 3.15, p = 0.048, η p 2 = 0.07.

However, a marginally significant interaction [ F (2.902,493.418) = 2.408, p = 0.048] indicated that the peak in preference for intermediate D was slightly lower, and preference for low D higher, in synthetic edge images compared to the other two variations.

Beta-band PSD at electrode O1 showed a marginally significant negative correlation with flight time (r = −0.293, p = 0.048) but did not reach significance with the composite indicator F ( p = 0.096).

The only contrasts that were significant or approached significance were the Literal ∗ Site interaction at 300 ms (β = -0.342, SE = 0.155, t = 1.976, p = 0.048); the Metaphor ∗ Site interaction at 300 ms (β = -0.293, SE = 0.151, t = 1.939, p = 0.053) and the Literal ∗ Site interaction at 450 ms (β = -0.258, SE = 0.139, t = 1.860, p = 0.063).

However, the moderating role of gender on the association between celebrity worship and self-esteem received support as the interaction term was marginally significant (β = –0.04, p = 0.048).

TRANSFER OF TDT TRAINING The results of the FrACT, analyzed with paired t -tests, showed a trend toward improvement of the Vernier task [ t (11) = 2.22; p = 0.048, not corrected for multiple comparisons; otherwise p = 0.2, Bonferroni corrected] in the patient group (see Figure 5 ).

Findings highlighted that the IUS-12 × NPOQ interaction, i.e., the conditional indirect effect, was slightly significant and positive ( b = 0.90, SE = 0.47, t = 1.92, p = 0.049, 99% CIs = 0.3107, 2.1192), thus suggesting that the path is moderated by IUS-12 scores.

Regarding the activities performed outside of professional activity, the Chi-square test showed a marginally significant trend in caregiving ( p = 0.049) and participation in household activities ( p = 0.025), both more frequently reported in the Imagery sector.

A slight increase was found for S1 but it was only marginally significant with a low correlation coefficient (S1, slope = 0.032 blinks per minute, r (2) = 0.1, p = 0.049).

The Kruskal–Wallis test used to compare English productive vocabulary scores across the three groups showed a marginally significant effect of group, H(2) = 6, p = 0.049.

As can be seen there was a highly significant cross-country variability in the distribution of all factors displayed in Tables 1 – 3 , with the exception of occupational status of interviewees ( p = 0.049) and “ concerns for my job ” ( p = 0.155) and “ stability of the global economy ” ( p = 0.067) in the near future ( Table 3 ).

Femininity was a marginally significant predictor of thin ideal internalization, with a small effect size (β = 0.1302, z = 1.97, p = 0.049), although the corresponding confidence interval included zero (95% CI [−0.0219, 0.4400]). 4 Discussion This study extends existing research by examining sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals in Romania, an Eastern European context largely underrepresented in the literature on eating disorders.

The present findings suggested that TDP was associated with increased BMI with borderline significance ( P = 0.049) and the prevalence of each category of BMI was similar between men with TDP and those without TDP.

Perceptual thresholds for detecting coherent motion (the minimum coherence level guaranteeing 80% accuracy) were higher (lower performance level) in patients than in controls [controls: 25.05 ( SD = 16.05), patients: 43.25( SD = 36.06)]; the group difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.049, Cohen's d = 0.65).

Overall effects of the experimental manipulation on the frequency of chills show a marginally significant difference in distribution of chills depending on listening conditions ( x 2 = 3.85, p = 0.049, φ = 0.23); this is reflective of a consistent nominal but non-significant pattern found for each piece, with all original conditions resulting in a higher frequency of chills responses across listeners.

In addition, the interaction of perceptual load × group was marginally significant [ F (2, 76) = 3.368, p = 0.049, η p 2 = 0.081].

This was the case in unadjusted and adjusted analyses, although this was of borderline significance in people bereaved by suicide ( p = 0.049).

The coefficient for the Duration was marginally significant ( p = 0.049), while the coefficients for Distance and Speed were not statistically significant.

This is because, in other parts of the DMN, we found a highly significant effect of age in posterior-ventral PCC during semantic matching ( x = −18 y = −68 z = 20, z -score = 5.2; at p < 0.05 FWE-corrected), with greater deactivations for younger than older subjects.

However, there was a strong trend for mean BVPamp [ t (16) = −2.119; p = 0.050; effect size d = 0.51], which was lower during paraphrasing than during taking notes.

The difference between GE and PE was almost significant ( p = 0.05).

A two-way mixed-design ANOVA revealed a marginally significant interaction between the type of article (Martian life vs. synthetic life) and affect (positive vs. negative), F (1,503) = 3.73, p = 0.05, η p 2 = 0.007, such that reactions of those in the Martian life condition showed a stronger positivity bias than reactions of those in the synthetic life condition.

A two-way (feedback × base interval) repeated-measures ANOVA indicated a marginally significant main effect of the base interval [ F (1,15) = 4.53, p = 0.050, η p 2 = 0.231], and a significant main effect of feedback [ F (1,15) = 5.80, p = 0.029, η p 2 = 0.279].

Moreover, the predictor calmness between-subject was significantly associated with non-exercise activity, and the predictor valence between-subject approached significance ( p = 0.050 and p = 0.053, respectively; refer to Table 1 ).

Again, no other predictor reached conventional levels of significance although warmth was a marginally significant negative predictor, B = −0.62, SE = 0.32, Exp(B) = 0.54, p = 0.05.