Excerpts

1 A two-factor repeated-measures ANOVA on onset-offset match shows a marginally significant effect of contrast [ F (1, 3) = 9.83, p = 0.052], but no significant effect of match type [onset vs. offset, F (1, 3) = 0.02, p = 0.89] and no significant interaction [ F (1, 3) = 3.92, p = 0.14].

The regression coefficient of extraversion was still significant ( p = 0.012), and that of spatial ability was almost significant ( p = 0.052), while the other regression coefficients were not significant ( p > 0.10).

However, since the predicted finding for the recombined combination came close to significance ( p = 0.052) we are reluctant to completely rule out the possibility that the findings reported here also reflect associative memory according to a more stringent definition.

The main effect of frontality reached marginal significance, F (4, 120) = 3.737, p = 0.052, η p 2 = 0.111, while the main effect of laterality F (2, 60) = 0.180, p = 0.833, η p 2 = 0 . 006 did not.

For DBP ( Figure 3D ), the time-point effect approached significance ( p = 0.052, η p 2 = 0.769), however pairwise comparisons demonstrated no differences between any time-point (all p > 0.05).

The groups showed a marginally significant difference in offspring age ( F [2,151] = 3.01, p = 0.052).

Results also showed that the indirect effect of ToM on social preference through externalizing behavior was very close to statistical significance ( z = 1.94, p = 0.052).

Under the sentence conditions, an rANOVA with these two factors on the accuracy showed significant main effects of scrambling and topicalization [scrambling, F (1,16) = 12, p = 0.0036; topicalization, F (1,16) = 9.5, p = 0.0072], and an interaction between these factors was marginally significant [ F (1,16) = 4.4, p = 0.052].

Regarding immediate self-efficacy for core-muscle exercise (H3a and RQ3a), the ANCOVA showed a nearly significant interaction between avatar body shape and sex, F (1,89) = 3.87, p = 0.052, η 2 = 0.04 ( Figure 5 ).

Results showed a marginally significant effect of Experiments [ F (2,57) = 3.123, p = 0.052, η p 2 = 0.099].

This analysis indicated an almost significant difference of error rates between word categories [down: 1.06%, neutral: 1.06%, up: 1.94%; F (2, 52) = 3.14, p = 0.052].

The correlation between the length of the delay and mother’s education approached significance r = 0.452, p = 0.052.

The cross-species comparison between apes and humans on the distribution of the tendency to avoid mixes containing the least preferred ingredient approached significance–χ 2 = 3.764, p = 0.052.

neurogenetics BDNF memory recall recognition A two-way interaction between BDNF and COMT genotype on recall scores was approaching significance [ F (1,96) = 3.864, p = 0.052].

Nevertheless, due to smaller sample sizes and consequently lower statistical power, some of the main effects were only marginally significant when analyzing each of samples separately (i.e., p -values for differences in the intellectual strengths were p = 0.052 and 0.086 in the mixed sample and in the nurses sample, respectively).

Finally, the coefficient of lastborns is positive and marginally significant (β = 0.15; p = 0.052) suggesting lastborns were not disadvantaged compared to only children in mother–child closeness.

Cognitive Reflection was a borderline significant predictor of decision biases beyond intelligence 7 ( b = −0.11, p = 0.052, change in R 2 = 0.004).

The analysis comparing typically collectivistic cultures with individualistic cultures approached significance ( p = 0.052) for ability mindset, such that participants from typically collectivistic cultures displayed lower fixed mindsets, in line with previous literature (Church et al., 2012 ; Tang et al., 2016 ).

The results demonstrate a negative parameter estimate, B = -0.172, SE = 0.088, which was significant at 0.10 and approached significance at.05, t = -1.945, p = 0.052.

We found no significant differences between the two groups on any of these measures (all p s > 0.25), except for a marginally significant difference in visual ANS RT ( p = 0.052), which was due to faster RTs in the ANS training group compared to the PA training group.

The interaction between gender and adiposity was marginally significant [ F (1,81) = 3.88, p = 0.052, η p 2 = 0.05].

Sentence stress differences in stressed prefixes had only a marginally significant effect (“w+s+” vs. “w+s−,” W = 14,189.5, p = 0.052, mean values: 0.889 vs. 0.864).

Although the total effect of PA on aggression was marginally significant ( B = 0.0643, p = 0.0526), the indirect effect through state anger was statistically significant (BootLLCI = 0.0015, BootULCI = 0.0325).

A total of 91% of patients without comorbid disorders were in remission at follow-up compared to 58.3% for patients with comorbidity (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.12), and the difference in Y-BOCS (Comorbidity: M = 11.45, SD = 7.03, No-Comorbidity: M = 7.74, SD = 4.83) was nearly significant, t (33) = 2.01, p = 0.053.

In The Bachelor shows, the main effect of cultural region exhibited only marginal significance, F (3, 97) = 2.66, p = 0.053, η 2 = 0.08.