Simple slope analysis ( Figure 3 ) showed that for patients with low resilience (−1 SD), the negative association between SPB and lifestyle was steep and highly significant (Slope = −1.60, p < 0.001).
Excerpts
The analysis of the EEM scores revealed a highly significant effect of load [ F (1,38) = 24.6, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0 . 39 ] with a higher EEM in LL [ M (LL) = 0.149, SE ± 0.027; M (HL) = −0.017, SE ± 0.022], as well as emotion [ F (1,38) = 8.56, p = 0.006, η p 2 = 0 . 18 ], and an interaction load × emotion [ F (1,38) = 7.39, p = 0.01, η p 2 = 0 .16 ].
The analysis revealed a highly significant effect on the model fit [ χ 2 (1) = 222.59, p < 0.001].
HPES groups) two-way ANOVA on CPCN after priming revealed that the main effect for Priming was not significant ( F < 1), whereas the main effect for Explanatory Style was highly significant, F (1,110) = 15.19, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.121.
There were highly significant, negative correlations between in-body and out-of-body experiences ( r 49 between −0.53 and −0.64, all p < 0.001 for each condition; r 49 = −0.63, p < 0.001 across conditions).
For the language tasks, the Expressive One Word Picture Vocabulary Test demonstrated a highly significant effect of group, F (2, 54) = 34.829, p < 0.001, and this was driven by all three groups being significantly different from one another: non-native signer < native signer, p = 0.029, non-native signer < hearing, p = 0.001, and native signer < hearing, p = 0.009.
Moderating effect of indecisiveness on rumination and depressive symptoms Utilizing a robust Wald test, the overall model fit was highly significant, R 2 = 0.54, χ 2 (9) = 268.46, p < 0.001.
A highly significant influence on mental exhaustion was found for the predictor variable quantitative demands after inclusion of all variables (model 2) ( B = 0.38, β = 0.39, p < 0.001).
Differences in semantic relatedness ratings were highly significant between semantically related and unrelated pairs ( P < 0.001 for all pairwise comparisons).
Among them, the social value shows a highly significant positive effect (β = 0.520, p < 0.001), followed by the economic value (β = 0.486, p < 0.001).
There were highly significant increases in the number of words remembered over Trials I-V (linear trend F = 312.74, p < 0.001; quadratic trend F = 17.64, p < 0.001; for all effects reported in this section df = 1.32), indicating learning of words over trials.
Results from the critical ratio method indicated that all items had highly significant critical values ( P < 0.001).
For sP and sDHEA, no moderation effects were observed, while for sE2, a positive trend for hostility ( R 2 = 0.3418, p = 0.001; B = 0.1168, SE = 0.0687, p = 0.0922, R 2 change = 0.0192) and physical aggression ( R 2 = 0.3605, p < 0.001; B = 0.0860, SE = 0.0493, p = 0.0841, R 2 change = 0.0197) emerged.
The results revealed a highly significant main effect of test duration [ F (5,65) = 226.765, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.946], showing the reproduction durations increasing as a function of the test durations.
The primary effect of time was highly significant ( F = 509.072, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.924), indicating a consistent reduction in depression severity across all groups over time.
When applied to the active conditions ( Figures 11B and 12B ) the effect of lobe becomes highly significant, F (1,60) = 184, p < 0.001, where the frontal lobe contribution is much larger then that of the temporal lobe, but the effects of beat and rhythm condition are abolished.
A highly significant association was observed between intention (unintentional vs. intentional) and children’s responses across all five questions ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 3 ).
Nevertheless, a highly significant positive correlations between error rates and reaction times (German: r = 0.788, p < 0.001; English: r = 0.688, p < 0.001) indicated a similar response pattern for errors and RTs disconfirming a speed accuracy trade off.
SCAT-A scores also showed a significant trend toward lower scores with longer years of competition [the shortest group: 20.5 (4.2), the longest group: 18.5 (4.3), p < 0.001 for trend].
For the color, identity, and location questions, the only independent variable that had predictive power was semantic relatedness (Figure 5 A), which was highly significant in all cases ( p < 0.001).
The result was highly significant— F (16.02, 4236.45) = 81.65, p < 0.001, with Greenhouse-Geiser correction for violations of sphericity.
While age and gender were not statistically associated with Romanticism, race, education, and employment were all highly significant ( p < 0.001).
An MI value greater than 10.83 reflects a highly significant improvement at P < 0.001 and should be prioritized in model modifications ( Just Enough, n.d. ).
The coefficient is negative and highly significant (β = −0.220, p < 0.001).
As hypothesized, ELE emerged as a highly significant positive predictor of WTC ( β = 0.62, t = 17.48, p < 0.001).