Excerpts

In contrast, confusion did not significantly predict exploratory behavior; however, in case of incorrect answers the path coefficient was positive and marginally significant ( p = 0.060).

When word frequency was added as a covariate in the analysis it approached significance ( F (1,2.732) = 3.45, p = 0.06).

The Trees & Bio group saw a marginally significant improvement over the No GI group ( p = 0.06).

The main effect of Block was marginally significant [ F (2.864,112) = 2.602, p = 0.06, partial η 2 = 0.085], whereas no interaction between Session and Block was identified [ F (4,112) = 0.654, p = 0.625, partial η 2 = 0.023].

RESULTS Error rates Speakers made more errors in reproducing sentences with weak bias verbs ( M = 0.36, SD = 0.48) than strong bias verbs ( M = 0.31, SD = 0.46), but the difference was only marginally significant (β = -0.25, SE = 0.13, z = -1.90, p = 0.06).

A significant expertise-by-complexity interaction, F (1, 28) = 4.640, p = 0.04, suggested that non-musicians were less sensitive to stylistic differences; moreover, a marginally non-significant complexity-by-entropy interaction, F (1, 28) = 3.763, p = 0.06, suggested that the complex stimuli might not have produced the expected main effects of entropy.

The main effect of age was marginally significant, with children aged 5–6 sharing more than those aged 3–4, F (1,146) = 3.68, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.05.

While the trends indicated that all aspects of self-esteem followed the same general pattern (i.e., synchronous > asynchronous), only the appearance subscale approached significance, t (64) = 2.4, p = 0.06, d = 0.6, 95% CI of mean difference: 0.4, 4.7, suggesting that this aspect may have been driving the overall self-esteem effect more so than the performance, t (64) = 1.4, p = 0.51, 95% CI of mean difference: -0.5, 3.0, or social subscales, t (64) = 1.3, p = 0.60, 95% CI of mean difference: -0.8, 3.7.

The 2 (hazard: low, high) × 2 (congruency: congruent, incongruent) repeated-measure ANOVA analysis on accuracy rate indicated that the main effect of congruency was marginally significant [ F (1 , 22) = 3.81, P = 0.06, η 2 = 0.15].

In Experiment A, RTs for correct responses to events were numerically longer in the low-salient event ( M = 666 ms, SD = 139) than in the high-salient event condition ( M = 606, SD = 128) and this difference approached significance, t (19) = 2.00, p = 0.060, d z = 0.45.

An ANOVA-type statistics (ATS) with within-subject factor Moment (interesting, non-interesting) and between-subject factor Person (PwD, MT) showed a significant interaction between Moment and Person [ATS(1) = 15.72, p < 0.001] and a marginally significant effect of Person [ATS(1) = 3.41, p = 0.06].

Rotation had a significant effect on RTs, F (1,21) = 19.65, MSe = 7459.94, p < 0.001, and a marginally significant effect on errors, F (1,21) = 4.19, MSe = 0.03, p < 0.06, with rotated conditions being 13 ms faster and 2.7% more often correct.

When adjusting for age and gender, we found no changes in the pattern of results with one exception: the direct effect of self-control just missed significance, b = 0.198, β = 0.210, SE = 0.105, p = 0.060.

For the emotion labeling effect, the overall model was nearly significant, R 2 adj. = 0.10, F (5,55) = 2.28, p = 0.06.

This tendency marginally approached significance (461 ms and 484 ms, respectively, F (1,17) = 4, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.19).

Univariate multiple linear regressions indicated that the interaction predicted P200 to positive stimuli over the right hemisphere ( B = –0.54, Δ R 2 = 0.05, p = 0.05), and predicted P200 to each condition (including neutral) over the left hemisphere, though the positive condition was only marginally significant (positive: B = –0.50, Δ R 2 = 0.04, p = 0.06; neutral: B = –0.56, Δ R 2 = 0.05, p = 0.03; negative: B = –0.74, Δ R 2 = 0.07, p = 0.01).

For the analysis of different score of d4, d3, d2, d1 for both high- and low-level group together, it showed that there is no significant difference in d3, d2, and d1 for two groups, with marginal significance in d4, p = 0.06.

The repeated measure ANOVAs revealed only a marginally significant accuracy-based composite effect within the same trials [Alignment: F (1, 27) = 4.00, p < 0.06, η ^ p 2 = 0.13] after taking the experimental progression into account [Block: ε ^ GG = 0.67, F (2.02, 54.44) = 9.57, p < 0.01, η ^ p 2 = 0.26).

For game 1 (n-shaped), greater anticipatory SCR was associated (an almost significant correlation) with improved performance, OR (odds ratio) = 0.03, p = 0.06, R 2 = 0.001.

The standardized parameter estimates in Table 3 indicated that the alliance with the therapist delivering TAU at the outpatient service at baseline was associated with all aspects of patient motivation to change (i.e., autonomous motivation, ability and importance to change and a trend toward significance for controlled motivation, p = 0.06).

Although we found no age differences in parent-report of impersonation ( p = 0.42), we found marginally significant age differences in parent-report of ICs [ F (2,61) = 2.97, p = 0.06] with 9-year-olds having the lowest rate of parent-report (76%).

The simple main effect of test time showed that the cognitive training group significantly improved on executive control, F (1,66) = 28.57, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.30, the active control group showed a trend of improvement, F (1,66) = 3.61, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.05, and the waitlist group did not show any improvement ( p = 0.84).

Moreover, the interaction of partner diagnosis and social motivation was marginally significant for autistic actors ( b = 0.02, SE = 0.01, p = 0.06).

Further demonstrating the utility of the initial dip as a biomarker for metabolic overdrive, neither group alone (nor as a single aggregated group) had significant correlations between the subsequent PVC positive response (~6 s post stimulus onset) and drift rate improvement ( Figure 5B ; though the correlation of the minority group was marginally significant cc = −0.62, P = 0.06).

In females only, SPQ-Eccentric Behavior scores were also positively associated with greater weekend time and self-report spare time on video games, with the relationship marginally non-significant ( p = 0.06).