For Caucasians, the main effect of condition was marginally significant ( p = 0.07), the main effect of SOA was significant ( p < 0.01), and the interaction was not significant.
Excerpts
However, the main effect of span was marginally significant [ F (2, 67) = 2.67, p = 0.07, η 2 =0.19], and there was a significant Elaboration x Span interaction [ F (2, 67) = 3.97, p = 0.05, η 2 =0.23].
ERPs Results As shown in Figure 3 , the ANOVA on N400 amplitude showed that the main effect of disclosure was marginally significant [ F (1, 32) = 3.515, p = 0.070, η p 2 = 0.099].
The interaction between trial type and age group was marginally significant, F (1,20) = 3.58, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.15.
Although the relationship between wife’s hair length and husband-rated wife’s attractiveness showed marginal significance ( β = 0.11, SE = 0.06, 95% CI = [−0.014, 0.230], p = 0.070), the indirect effect remained significant. 1 On the other hand, the indirect pathway from husband’s hair length to sexual frequency via wife-rated husband’s attractiveness and wife’s sexual desire did not yield significance.
of marginal significancep = 0.07
The student’s independent-samples t -test, by assessing the changes (i.e., post-task–pre-task) on each dimension and on the total scale of the SOFI, showed that they were of statistical significance between groups when looking at sleepiness [ t (19) = 2.10; p = 0.05; η 2 = 0.188] as well as of marginal significance in total fatigue [ t (19) = 1.89; p = 0.07; η 2 = 0.159].
The main effect of the group is marginally significant, F (1, 46) = 3.34, p = 0.07, partial η 2 = 0.07, and the N2 amplitude in the music training group was marginally greater than that in the control group. 3.2.2 P3 Results on P3 showed a main effect of group, F (1, 46) = 13.68, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.23.
After 4 weeks, the differences between HIIT and CON in WC reached marginal significance ( p = 0.07).
The analysis of variance revealed a marginally significant difference between the scale values of valence pre and post-training sessions [ F (1, 11) = 3.99; p = 0.07; η 2 = 0.27].
Finally, a three-way validity × believability × stimulation condition was marginally significant, F ( 1 , 33 ) = 3 . 58 , p = 0 . 07 , η p 2 = 0 . 10 .
This finding was consistently found for the four groups of students, but the difference in LMA between girls and boys in grade 10 was marginally significant ( p = 0.07).
The only marginally significant relation found was between multilingualism as a continuous score and RT specifically in incongruent trials [ t (154) = 1.82, p = 0.070].
Furthermore, the intervention predicted participants’ personal norm marginally significant ( B = −0.17; p = 0.07, CI [−0.349; 0.016]), which in turn predicted participants’ willingness to offer expired but still edible food highly significant ( B = 0.05, p < 0.001, CI [0.019; 0.076]).
For the 1 s delay condition, a marginally significant difference was evident between the high sleep quality group and the low sleep quality group ( p = 0.07).
approached significancep = 0.07
The interaction of Performance with Size approached significance [ F (1,87) = 3.37, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.33].
However, we also obtained a marginally significant interaction effect between these two factors, F (2, 308) = 2.66, p = 0.07, η = 0.02.
For example, parent use of praise per minute was related to parent spatial language per minute, r (31)=0.52, p <0.05, and the relation between parent praise and parent use of persistence-focused language per minute was approaching significance, r (31)=0.33, p =0.07.
approached significancep = 0.07
There was no significant relationship between context effects and scores on consonant, vowel or sentence recognition (the correlation between vowel recognition and gender context effect approached significance; t = 2.32, adjusted p = 0.07).
We found marginally significant evidence indicating the hypothesized moderating effect of age on peer influence on STEM-related activities (β = −1.44, SE = 0.97, one-sided p = 0.07).
Also, a moderate, marginally significant correlation was found in the Down condition (Pearson’s r = 0.55, p = 0.07, Figure 4B ).
Within Solo condition, music segments 1 and 5 are statistically lower than other music segments ( p < 0.001) and within Ensemble condition, music segments 1 and 5 are, respectively statistically ( p < 0.001) and marginally significant ( p = 0.07). 4.
Total reading time analyses for the ADJ region yielded the same pattern but the effect was only marginally significant ( t = -1.85, p = 0.07).
Raising children had marginal significance on health membership ( p = 0.07).
In addition, we found a marginally significant interaction effect between embodiment and attitude, p = 0.07.
The difference between refugee and recently immigrated parents was close to being significant ( t = 1.850, p = 0.070).