Barely Significant

Excerpts

6,422 sentences · 1 filter applied

a marginal trendp = 0.0741.5× alphagold
Finally, there was a marginal trend for geminate fricatives to have a lower mean Harmonic-to-Noise ratio (HNR) than singleton fricatives (0.8 < 4.0 dB), t (14) = 1.91, p = 0.074, i.e., to be “noisier.” The same trend was found with the vowel preceding /t:/ compared to /t/ (9.7 < 12.7 dB), t (22) = 1.93, p = 0.063.
approached significancep = 0.0741.5× alpha
Planned post-hoc analyses revealed that mean N400 amplitude for identity prime-target pairs was reduced relative to unrelated prime-target pairs across all regions, i.e., at frontal, t (15) = 2.23, p = 0.042, d = 0.25, fronto-central, t (15) = 2.95, p = 0.01, d = 0.37, and central t (15) = 2.46, p = 0.026, d = 0.43, regions, and approached significance for the centro-parietal region, t (15) = 1.92, p = 0.074, d = 0.48.
marginally significantP = 0.0741.5× alphagold
The correlation between SCR-a and perceived intensity was marginally significant only after controlling for the perceived pleasantness of the odors ( N = 7, r = −0.768, P = 0.074) and significant after controlling for ratings of familiarity ( N = 7, r = −0.823, P = 0.044) indicating that SCR-a increased with the perceived intensity of an odor.
Do ambient urban odors evoke basic emotions?
Front Psychol · 2014 · PMC4017720
only marginally significantP = 0.07411.5× alphagold
The correlation between observed and predicted AU2ROC is positive and statistically significant only for the MP ( Figure 7A , r = 0.36, P = 0.0232) while it is not statistically significant for the QSR ( Figure 7C , r = 0.06, P = 0.7233) and only marginally significant for the SCR ( Figure 7B , r = 0.29, P = 0.0741).
marginally significantp = 0.0751.5× alphagold
The results showed a marginally significant interaction between time and group [ F (1,64) = 3.286, p = 0.075, η p 2 = 0.050]; this result supported the second hypothesis that students from the experimental group improved more on creativity than those from the control group ( Table 2 ).
showed a trendp = 0.0751.5× alpha
In contrast, the HOC group ( M = 12.48, SD = 5.06) showed a trend toward a higher sense of negative agency compared to the LOC group [( M = 9.64, SD = 2.87), t (22.47) = 1.87, p = 0.075, d = 0.69]. 3.2.3 Explaining implicit sense of agency – regression analysis Tone binding in the HOC group was significantly predicted by OCI-R total scores ( F (1, 13) = 5.53, R 2 = 0.298, p = 0.035; beta = −10.49, t = −2.35, p = 0.035).
near-significantp = 0.0751.5× alphagold
It shows a near-significant age effect for C2, F (10,4) = 8.5; p = 0.075; a significant age effect for C3, F (10,4) = 27.3; p = 0.00002; for C4, F (10,4) = 15.8; p = 0.003, and for C5, F (10,4) = 23.9; p = 0.00008.
The Emergence of Tool Use in Preterm Infants.
Front Psychol · 2016 · PMC4949218