The 5–50 mg/kg doses of ME showed a highly significant reduction of the paw edema at 2, 4, and 6 h after the initiation of edema compared with the control ( p < 0.001).
Excerpts
All tested 2-way interactions evaluated (amplitude × amplitude, amplitude × time, time × solvent-to-solid ratio) resulted in highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Table S1 ).
The linear terms A and B, the interaction term CD and the quadratic terms A 2 , B 2 , C 2 , and D 2 in the model showed extremely significant effects ( p < 0.001).
thermophilus across all treatments and declined systematically during storage, which was confirmed by highly significant effects of SCGL concentration ( p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.994), time ( p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.890) and their interaction ( p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.976) ( Figure 1 ).
Leaf Mineral Content There were highly significant differences ( p ≤ 0.001) among the genotypes from different ecological regions for most of the mineral contents including Mg, P, Al, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn ( Table 1 ).
The results were considered significant at * p < 0.05, very significant at ** p < 0.01, or highly significant at *** p < 0.001.
As shown in Table 3 , highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) were detected by 18, 16, and 18 out of 20 panelists for the omission models of 4-methyl-2-methoxyphenol, 3-(methylsulfanyl)propan-1-ol, and 3-(methylsulfanyl)propanal, respectively.
Additionally, the interaction between microwave power and ultrasound power ( X 1 X 3 ) was moderately significant (F = 28.29, p < 0.001).
After post-hoc testing, the following significance levels were specified: extremely significant ( p < 0.001; ***/+++/###, very significant ( p < 0.01; **/++/##), significant ( p < 0.05; */+/#), and not significant ( p > 0.05).
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the quadratic regression models for both systems were highly significant ( p < 0.001), while the lack-of-fit terms were not significant ( p > 0.05), indicating good model fit and accurate prediction of interactions among multiple components.
The analysis of variance showed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) influence of treatment, and the interaction treatment × time on the average particle size, encapsulation efficiency, and toxicity of the emulsions.
Statistical significance was defined as highly significant (*** p < 0.001).
Considering tannin seasonal pattern, a decreasing trend during berry ripening was highlighted for skin TT concentration and content in both years ( p < 0.001 for 2011 and p < 0.01 for 2012), similarly to previous studies [ 5 , 37 ].
A one-way ANOVA test applied on the concentrations values of the identified compounds listed in Table 1 showed that there is a highly significant difference between these three extracts ( p < 0.001). 2.2.
extremely significantqualified
The p -value of <0.05 was considered a significant difference, while p < 0.01 was considered as highly significant, and p < 0.001 was considered as extremely significant. 5.
The ANOVA of the quadratic regression model demonstrated that the model was highly significant, as was evident from a very low probability value ( p = 0.001).
Nevertheless, in this case, the effect was not significant ( p < 0,05) only in young worms (day 2) at 200 μM, while it is highly significant ( p < 0.001) at 300 μM and in adults in post-reproductive stage (day 9), with respect to controls reproductive stage (day 9), with respect to controls.
All statistical tests were 2-sided, and p < 0.05 (*) were considered statistically significant, p < 0.01 (**) highly significant, and p < 0.001 (***) extremely significant. 5.
A one-way ANOVA test applied on the concentrations values of the identified compounds listed in Table 1 showed that there is a highly significant difference between these two extracts ( p < 0.001). 2.2.
Highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) in signal intensity between HEAO and HLBO were observed for 3-pentanone and its dimer, ethyl 2-methylbutanoate, limonene, α-pinene, ethyl acetate and its dimer, ethyl 2-methylpropanoate, benzaldehyde, and methyl 2-methylbutanoate.
The Model term is extremely significant ( p < 0.001), and the Lack of Fit term is not significant ( p > 0.05), indicating that the model equation is suitable for estimating the TPC extraction yield from T. sebifera leaves.
The results of ANOVA analysis applied on peroxide values show highly significant ( p < 0.001) main effects (antioxidant and time) but also a highly significant ( p < 0.001) interaction effect.
The results revealed that the cooking method had the most significant impact on PAH formation, with a highly significant effect ( p < 0.001) across all PAHs.
The PCA (highly significant results p < 0.001, by permutational multivariate analysis of variance, PERMANOVA) showed that control plants grown under conditions of Fe sufficiency and those exposed to volatiles from L264 had similar mass spectra, since treatments were grouped together.
For the responses of RSA, TIA, and CIA, the models were highly significant when the computed F-values were greater than the tabulated F-value and the probability values were low ( p < 0.001); this indicates that the individual terms in each response model were significant in terms of the interaction effect [ 37 ].