Excerpts

By contrast, the global OH abundance in the SSP370 scenario exhibits a decreasing trend of 0.037‒0.15% yr −1 ( P < 0.001) over 2015‒2100 among these models, together with an increase in tropospheric O 3 of 0.11‒0.17% yr −1 ( P < 0.001) (Supplementary Figs. 3 and 4 ).

Supporting the notion of trait-like stability in sAA, we observed highly significant medium- and large-sized correlations in baseline sAA between the 3 days (day 1–2: R(51) = 0.46, p < 0.001; day 1–3: R(51) = 0.61, p < 0.001; day 2–3: R(51) = 0.60, p < 0.001; n = 53; Supplementary Fig. 4a–c ).

The normalization procedure yields a statistically highly significant correlation (adjusted R 2 = 0.68 with p value <0.001), thus supporting our hypothesized exponential relationship between MAR at a certain location in the fjord, relative to both the core location’s distance to the margin of the most productive glacier and to the surface runoff from the glacier catc

A Fisher’s exact test on the 2 × 2 contingency table (therapy group × radiographic progression status) is highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The findings of these two datasets demonstrate highly significant correlation as compared to randomized data ( p < 0.001).

18 showed a highly significant difference in ldPHI and zldPhi scores between our sorted VTE and non-VTE trials (Mann–Whitney Rank sum test, p < 0.001).

Notably, there is a highly significant positive trend (linear regression, r 2 adj = 0.51, p < 0.001) in beach area for southern California, whereas the trend in northern California is moderate to weak (r 2 adj = 0.11, p = 0.02) and there is no significant trend in central California (r 2 adj = −0.02; p = 0.56; Fig. 1 ).

Although the overall number of significant tests between clusters at each follow-up remained stable at each follow-up, the number of highly significant pairwise statistical test (i.e., p < 0.001) decreased from 60.0 to 36.7%.

We found a highly significant increase in tuning width with an increase in target duration (Fig. 4C, F ; T JT = 5.54, p < 0.001 for the cue offset alignment; T JT = 3.87, p < 0.001 for the response onset alignment; Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test).

The model can make predictions of the WNP TC density averaged over the WNP (0°–60°N,100°E–180°) during June–August, which corresponds to the first half of the WNP TC season 34 , with a highly significant skill ( r = 0.67, p < 0.001) for the first summer (Fig. 5a ) and a moderate skill ( r = 0.39, p = 0.017) for the second summer (Fig. 5b ).

The statistical significances in this work were analyzed via a two-sided Student’s t -test using the software SPSS 20 statistics (version 26.0), n.s., not significant; * P < 0.05, significant; ** P < 0.01, moderately significant; *** P < 0.001, highly significant.

2c , we observed a highly significant difference in predicted neuropathology scores between AD cases and controls (two-sided t test: t = 22.98, p < 0.001), and these differences were more pronounced for MD-AD compared with the other baseline models (results split by dataset are shown in Supplementary Figure 4a ).

The first canonical axis was highly significant (eigenvalue = 0.525, F = 31.999, p = 0.0010).

The lower prevalence of parasitism in the naïve catfish treatment was highly significant (Generalised Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with binomial error distribution, n = 509 host clutches; naïve vs. experienced catfish: z = 4.31, P < 0.001; naïve vs. highly experienced catfish: z = 3.60, P < 0.001), but the probability of parasitising cichlid clutches did not differ between experienced and highly experienced catfish ( z = 0.75, P = 0.452) (Supplementary Table 2 ).

An example of a highly significant d-colocalized pair is THBS1-COL5A1 , which appears as a proximal pair (PP test p-value < 0.001, at d = 4 μm) in ~67% of the 3,147 cells where both genes were detected (Supplementary Fig. 3 ).

P < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant and labeled as *, while ** represents P < 0.01 (highly significant), and *** represents P < 0.001 (very highly significant), respectively.

The analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a highly significant interaction between Groups, Quadrants and Memory-delay (F 2.5,134 =6.32, P =0.001, Greenhouse Geisser correction; Supplementary Table 6 ).

The difference in MH frequency between UBA and RUL is statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating a robust association between urban proximity and higher MH occurrence.

In fact, the negative R between W and SPEI over 22-year sliding windows showed a decreasing trend of −0.015 yr -1 ( p < 0.001 with a t -test; Fig. 1b ) from 1951–1972 ( R = −0.40, p > 0.05 with a t -test) to 1989–2010 ( R = −0.66, p < 0.001 with a t -test).

The two-decade trajectory reveals an increasing trend in global mining-driven deforestation from 2001 to 2012 ( + 90.26 km 2 /year, p < 0.001), followed by a decline since 2013 (−50.73 km 2 /year, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2d ).

Differences were considered statistically significant at *P < 0.05, very significant at ** P < 0.01, and extremely significant at *** P < 0.001.

coli genes (Supplementary Table 4 ), a highly significant dependence of functionality on phylogenetic distance for cell-interacting proteins (Mann–Whitney U -test, P < 0.001), but no change for drug-interacting resistance mediators (Mann–Whitney U -test, P = 0.57), was observed.

The quantitative data confirmed the previous qualitative observation in revealing a highly significant increased incidence of Type 1 cells in Cyfip1 +/− (LME: χ 2 (1) = 68.49, p < 0.001, Fig. 4c ).

Across Britain, there has been a highly significant increase in the diversity of birds using garden bird feeders since the 1970s, according to Simpson’s Diversity Index ( F = 355.0, df = 3.52, p < 0.001; Fig. 2a ).

P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (*), P < 0.01 as highly significant (**), P < 0.001 as extremely significant (***), and ns as not significant.