Results Quantitative variation in biomass and related traits A highly significant variation (p < 0.001) was observed among genotypes for all agronomic traits each and across years (Tables 2 and 3 ).
Excerpts
However, this correlative relationship in Peterson Creek was driven by the highly significant (R 2 = 0.90, P<0.001) relationship between DO concentration for stream temperatures <10°C ( Fig 5A ).
Nearly all extracts showed a highly significant cell migration ( p < 0.001) across concentrations and time points, except for the 50 μg/mL methanol extract, which exhibited lower wound closure (52.4 ± 3.2%, p < 0.05).
Correlation of miR-101 expression with OS and subgroup analysis Highly significant heterogeneity (I 2 = 68.6%, p<0.001) was detected when 19 studies were pooled.
For fat content, highly significant differences were also detected in fat content among the cultivars (p value < 0.001).
The improvement in exam scores from baseline was highly significant for both groups (Game group: 29.3% gain, Didactic group: 31.5% gain; p < 0.001 for each group; Figs 2 and 3 ).
The overall correlations between EPS concentration and substratum stability were highly significant (stability - carbohydrates r = 0.728, n = 29, p<0.001; stability - proteins r = 0.414, n = 29, p<0.05); giving evidence of the important role of EPS for both, developing and reversing substratum stability.
Offset turned out to be highly significant, F(1,8) = 26.17, p < .001, with SDs of offset judgments being about twice the SDs of onset judgments ( SD Onset = 26.9 ms; SD Offset = 45 ms).
Molecular Interactions Ingenuity based pathway analysis revealed highly significant overlap with 92 canonical pathways with p<0.001 and a total of 196 canonical pathways p<0.05.
This analysis confirmed that the increase in braille reading speed was highly significant (effect of testing session: F(5, 130) = 35.85, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.57).
The subsequent signal-detection theory-based analysis bolstered this finding by revealing only a highly significant interceptor effect ( F [1, 13] ≈ 243.8, p < 0.001) for the AUC, but no significant effects for the criterion ( F [1, 13] ≈ 2.2, p > 0.05).
The superiority of the two-factor model over the single-factor model was further supported by a lower Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) value for the two-factor model (AIC = 4376.1) as compared to the single-factor model (AIC = 4712.9) as well as a highly significant model comparison (Δχ 2 (1) = 1238.8, p < .001).
Multivariate analysis of grazing management variables, rest periods (days of rest per year), stocking rate and grazing days, found that there were indeed highly significant differences between rotational and continuous stocking practices (one-way PERMANOVA, pseudo-F = 11.14, P < 0.001).
Sport participation and physical activity guideline concordance After controlling for sex, grade level, and school type, there was a significant trend for association ( p < 0.001) between soccer or handball participation and physical activity guideline concordance ( Table 3 ).
For Miridae, treatment effects were highly significant in 2021 (F = 1871.29, p < 0.001) and remained significant in 2022 (F = 53.52, p = 0.0013).
Using this ranking, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA)[ 34 ] of the nearest gene to each HIF-1 α binding site demonstrated a highly significant (p<0.001) association between HIF-1 α binding and positive, but not negative, regulation of these transcripts ( Fig 1E ).
When analyzed by question type, the difference in consistent accuracy remained highly significant for Type A questions (adjusted p < 0.001).
We also ran a logistic regression to evaluate if ISI-cal was associated with future CVD events independent of metabolic syndrome, and found that the association between CVD and ISI-cal was highly significant (OR 4.7, 95% CI 2.9–7.4, p <0.001), even when metabolic syndrome was in the model (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1–3.1, p = 0.02).
This was highly significant ( P <0.001) for the interaction between trial 4 (4×MIC) and time for L . monocytogenes , S . aureus and S .
Although the mean difference is small, nevertheless it was highly significant (Mann-Whitney U test, z = 4.1, P < 0.001).
Analyses of variance revealed a highly significant CS by preceding reminder type interaction ( F (2, 54) = 7.63, p = .001, η p 2 = .22); see Fig 4 .
The difference between the two groups was highly significant (p<0.001).
Highly significant associations ( p < 0.001) were found for the terrain inclination and magnitude of L R , M c , M L 1 , and HR.
A strong trend of variation in sedentary and LIPA over the week was seen for both women and men (p<0.001).
Both, TTF1 and p63 revealed highly significant results for classification of LAC and SCC, respectively (p<0.001; table S1 ).