However, the interaction Assessment Time x Condition was highly significant (F(5,150) = 3.786, p = 0.003, η 2 p = 0.11).
Excerpts
Also the difference between both regression lines was highly significant (p = 0.003).
The increase was highly significant (from 40% to 80%) for G. mellonella ( P = 0.003), but not statistically significant (from 20% to 30%) for A. orientalis ( P = 0.552).
In our results, the ready availability of water showed a highly significant relationship with the cost of illness at (p < 0.003).
This is a highly significant change ( p = 0.003, paired two-tailed t -test), and the difference from baseline after switch-on is also highly significant ( p = 0.008, paired two-tailed t -test).
Further analysis of the sex interaction in MEST1 indicated a highly significant result in males for MHT in ABC36 alone (-0.929 95% CI -1.531,-0.326; p = 0.003; R 2 = 0.152) and in the combined cohort analysis (-0.807 95% CI -1.268,-0.346; p = 0.001; R 2 = 0.138).
Our results indicate that treatment with doxorubicin causes a highly significant decrease in both fibroblast ( P = 0.003) and osteoblast ( P = 0.013) colony forming units and concurrent treatment with 1D11 was able to significantly improved numbers of both CFU-Fs ( P = 0.013 ) and CFU-OBs ( P = 0.013 ) ( Figure 2A, B ).
A simple Kendall rank correlation between RDA1 and the numbers of species was also highly significant ( p = 0.003).
A highly significant, positive correlation of these two parameters was also identified (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.954; P = 0.003).
However, the difference in suppression between CD25- and CD25 low was highly significant, indicating that the type of responder T cell was found to be the major predictor variable for percentage of suppression (p = 0.003, n = 6 subjects, by GLM).
Correlation between Nitric Oxide and Inflammatory Serum/blood Parameters Our data reveal a highly significant negative correlation (Spearman’s correlation coefficient rho = −0.41, p = 0.003) between nasal NO and leucocytes in blood.
The random effect module was implemented due to slightly significant heterogeneity across the studies (I 2 = 55.8%, P = 0.003).
The interaction between the relevant feature and the experiment was highly significant, F (1, 39) = 10.16, MS e = 58719, p = .003.
This gender bias was highly significant (P = 0.003).
Additionally, a highly significant positive correlation between the level of expertise and the proximity to the reference structure was found (Spearman’s ρ = .665, p = 0.003; see Table 2 ).
Moreover, a significant trend (p = 0.003) in fluconazole use during the whole time period considered emerged, particularly in the ICU (p = 0.017), but also in the general medicine wards (p = 0.03).
did not achieve significancep = 0.0031
We observed similar results when performing the enrichment analysis for the Segway segmentation track of GM12878 ( S4 Table ): strong enhancers were the most enriched (p < 0.0001); weak enhancers and active promoters did not achieve significance at the Bonferoni threshold (p = 0.0031 and p = 0.0419, respectively).
The overall Φ ST value was highly significant (Φ ST = 0.644, P <0.0033) indicating strong genetic differentiation across all populations of T. newberryi .
The simulation confirmed that an intersection size greater than or equal to 41 is highly significant ( p = 0.0033).
Suppressed expression of BAP1 occurred in 22 GBC cases (46.8%) and showed a strong trend toward a worse median survival time of 13.3 months (95% CI, 17.6–62.6) (p = 0.0034).
Comparing mice infected with the first isolate (124A) with mice infected with the third (140A), or with the fourth (144), the overall differences in survival were highly significant ( P = 0.0034 and P = 0.0002).
This difference is highly significant (p<0.0035) in Fisher’s exact test.
Female teachers tended to give slightly higher grades than usual—an association which is significant in the random forest model (and the alternative linear regression model using weights, as is described S2 Text ), though not quite significant in the linear regression model (p = 0.0035), with a significance level of 0.0005.
Using a Fisher’s exact test, it can be calculated that the distribution of proteins with altered versus non-altered protein amounts in the histone group (3 versus 4) was highly significant different from what could be expected among non-histone proteins (41 regulated and 830 non-altered non-histone proteins, p = 0.0036).
The association between the Bray-Curtis distance matrices for the two data sets was highly significant (P = 0.0036, Mantel test).